The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of Kidney Stones in the United States
Open accessAbstract
Background The last nationally representative assessment of kidney stone prevalence in the United States occurred in 1994. After a 13-yr hiatus, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) reinitiated data collection regarding kidney stone history. Objective Describe the current prevalence of stone disease in the United States, and identify factors associated with a history of kidney stones. Design, setting, and participants A cross-sectional analysis of responses to the 2007–2010 NHANES (n = 12 110). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Self-reported history of kidney stones. Percent prevalence was calculated and multivariable models were used to identify factors associated with a history of kidney stones. Results and limitations The prevalence of kidney stones was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1–9.5). Among men, the prevalence of stones was 10.6% (95% CI, 9.4–11.9), compared with 7.1% (95% CI, 6.4–7.8) among women. Kidney stones were more common among obese than normal-weight individuals (11.2% [95% CI, 10.0–12.3] compared with 6.1% [95% CI, 4.8–7.4], respectively; p < 0.001). Black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic individuals were less likely to report a history of stone disease than were white, non-Hispanic individuals (black, non-Hispanic: odds ratio [OR]: 0.37 [95% CI, 0.28–0.49], p < 0.001; Hispanic: OR: 0.60 [95% CI, 0.49–0.73], p < 0.001). Obesity and diabetes were strongly associated with a history of kidney stones in multivariable models. The cross-sectional survey design limits causal inference regarding potential risk factors for kidney stones. Conclusions Kidney stones affect approximately 1 in 11 people in the United States. These data represent a marked increase in stone disease compared with the NHANES III cohort, particularly in black, non-Hispanic and Hispanic individuals. Diet and lifestyle factors likely play an important role in the changing epidemiology of kidney stones.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assimos, D., Krambeck, A., Miller, N. L., Monga, M., Murad, M. H., Nelson, C. P., Pace, K. T., Pais, V. M., Pearle, M. S., Preminger, G. M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090 · Cited by 1,457
Risk of Kidney Stones: Influence of Dietary Factors, Dietary Patterns, and Vegetarian–Vegan Diets
Ferraro, P. M., Bargagli, M., Trinchieri, A., & Gambaro, G. (2020) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu12030779 · Cited by 303
Obesity and kidney stone disease: a systematic review
Carbone, A., Al Salhi, Y., Tasca, A., Palleschi, G., Fuschi, A., De Nunzio, C., Bozzini, G., Mazzaferro, S., & Pastore, A. L. (2018) · Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica · doi:10.23736/s0393-2249.18.03113-2 · Cited by 169
Moore, C. L., Bomann, S., Daniels, B., Luty, S., Molinaro, A., Singh, D., & Gross, C. P. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g2191 · Cited by 157
Coconut Water: An Unexpected Source of Urinary Citrate
Patel, R. M., Jiang, P., Asplin, J., Granja, I., Capretz, T., Osann, K., Okhunov, Z., Landman, J., & Clayman, R. V. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/3061742 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Scales, C. D., Smith, A. C., Hanley, J. M., & Saigal, C. S.
- Venue
- European Urology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 160-165
- ISSN
- 0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2171942415
- Cited by
- 2,581
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 75.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Kidney Stones in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052
- The paper
- Scales, C. D., Smith, A. C., Hanley, J. M., & Saigal, C. S. (2012). Prevalence of Kidney Stones in the United States. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.