Cited by 12Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle Physiology and DisordersClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Critical analytical evaluation of promising markers for sarcopenia

Cavalier, E., Beaudart, C., Buckinx, F., Bruyère, O., Reginster, J.-Y.·2016·European Geriatric Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurger.2015.11.002

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cavalier, E., Beaudart, C., Buckinx, F., Bruyère, O., & Reginster, J.-Y.
Affiliations
University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
Cavalier, E.
Venue
European Geriatric Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
239-242
ISSN
1878-7649 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2189903775
Cited by
12
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Geriatric Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
sarcopenia, biomarkers, irisin, myostatin, PIIINP, osteoglycin, TMEM119, activin A, analytical performance, reference values, sample stability, chronic kidney disease, hemodialysis, sex differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review