Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in the gravity equation
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bergstrand et al. (2015) argue that estimates of RTAs may capture common globalisation trends and therefore be biased upward.
“Bergstrand et al. (2015) argue that the estimates of RTAs may capture common globalisation trends and, therefore, be biased upward.”
From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Bergstrand et al. (2015)
The RTA effects from column (10) captured some common globalisation effects.
“This is consistent with the main argument from Bergstrand et al. (2015) that the RTA effects from column (10) have indeed captured some common globalisation effects.”
From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Bergstrand et al. (2015)
The gravity equation captures the effects of globalisation quite well.
“Keeping in mind that these estimates are relative to the border effect in 1980, the results reveal that the gravity equation captures the effects of globalisation quite well, which is consistent with Bergstrand et al. (2015) but in contrast to Bhavnani et al. (2002), who argue that gravity models cannot capture the effects of globalisation and dub this 'the missing globalisation puzzle'.”
From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Bergstrand et al. (2015)
Cites
Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes <sup>*</sup>
Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441 · Cited by 2,436 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Heterogeneous effects of economic integration agreements
Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H., & Clance, M. W. (2018) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.08.014 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data
Larch, M., & Yotov, Y. V. (2024) · The World Economy · doi:10.1111/twec.13569 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantifying the partial and general equilibrium effects of sanctions on Russia
Flach, L., Heiland, I., Larch, M., Steininger, M., & Teti, F. A. (2024) · Review of International Economics · doi:10.1111/roie.12707 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bergstrand, J. H., Larch, M., & Yotov, Y. V.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
- Corresponding author
- Bergstrand, Jeffrey H.
- Venue
- European Economic Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-08
- Volume
- 78
- Pages
- 307-327
- ISSN
- 0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3121549813
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 60.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
- Keywords
- economic integration agreements, international boundaries, distance elasticity, gravity model, bilateral trade, export costs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review