Cited by 391Global trade and economicsGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessEconomic and Technological Innovation

Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in the gravity equation

Open access
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H., Larch, Mario, Yotov, Yoto V.·2015·European Economic Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.06.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bergstrand et al. (2015) argue that estimates of RTAs may capture common globalisation trends and therefore be biased upward.

    “Bergstrand et al. (2015) argue that the estimates of RTAs may capture common globalisation trends and, therefore, be biased upward.”

    From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Bergstrand et al. (2015)

  • The RTA effects from column (10) captured some common globalisation effects.

    “This is consistent with the main argument from Bergstrand et al. (2015) that the RTA effects from column (10) have indeed captured some common globalisation effects.”

    From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Bergstrand et al. (2015)

  • The gravity equation captures the effects of globalisation quite well.

    “Keeping in mind that these estimates are relative to the border effect in 1980, the results reveal that the gravity equation captures the effects of globalisation quite well, which is consistent with Bergstrand et al. (2015) but in contrast to Bhavnani et al. (2002), who argue that gravity models cannot capture the effects of globalisation and dub this 'the missing globalisation puzzle'.”

    From Estimating the effects of trade agreements: Lessons from 60 years of methods and data (2024) · cites this paper as Bergstrand et al. (2015)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergstrand, J. H., Larch, M., & Yotov, Y. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
Corresponding author
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H.
Venue
European Economic Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
78
Pages
307-327
ISSN
0014-2921 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121549813
Cited by
391
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
FWCI
60.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global Trade and Competitiveness
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
Keywords
economic integration agreements, international boundaries, distance elasticity, gravity model, bilateral trade, export costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review