Cited by 122Global trade and economicsEconomic Growth and ProductivityEconomic and Technological Innovation

Heterogeneous effects of economic integration agreements

Baier, Scott L., Bergstrand, Jeffrey H., Clance, Matthew W.·2018·Journal of Development Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.08.014

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of FTAs may differ across agreements or countries.

    “Furthermore, the effects of FTAs may be different across agreements or countries, as suggested by Kohl (2014), Baier et al. (2018Baier et al. ( , 2019)), and Freeman and Pienknagura (2019).”

    From Do Japan’s Free Trade Agreements Increase Its International Trade? (2022) · cites this paper as Baier et al. (2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baier, S. L., Bergstrand, J. H., & Clance, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • University of Notre Dame (US)
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
Corresponding author
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H.
Venue
Journal of Development Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
135
Pages
587-608
ISSN
0304-3878 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890900899
Cited by
122
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3
FWCI
23.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Development Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Kellogg Institute for International Studies
  • University of Pretoria's
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Technological Innovation
Keywords
economic integration agreements, trade liberalization, firm heterogeneity, Melitz model, extensive margin, intensive margin, trade elasticity, welfare effects, developing countries, port infrastructure, North-South trade, South-South trade

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review