ECNP Consensus Meeting, March 2003. Guidelines for the investigation of efficacy in social anxiety disorder
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pharmacological management of SAD remains problematic, despite several guidelines or consensus statements.
“The pharmacological management of SAD remains problematic, despite several guidelines or consensus statements issued over the past few years (Canadian Psychiatric Association, 2006; Montgomery et al, 2004).”
From Cannabidiol Reduces the Anxiety Induced by Simulated Public Speaking in Treatment-Naïve Social Phobia Patients (2011) · cites this paper as Montgomery et al, 2004
Cites
Mini-SPIN: A brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder
Connor, K. M., Kobak, K. A., Churchill, L. E., Katzelnick, D., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2001) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.1055 · Cited by 537 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The SPIN (Connor et al., 2001) has also proved to be a simple but useful efficacy scale.”
Phenelzine vs Atenolol in Social Phobia: A Placebo-Controlled Comparison
Liebowitz, M. R., Schneier, F., Campeas, R., Hollander, E., Hatterer, J., Fyer, A., Gorman, J., Papp, L., Davies, S., Gully, R., et al. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.49.4.290 · Cited by 444 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Early single centre studies were associated with relatively low placebo responses, e.g. 8%, 12% and 23% (Liebowitz et al., 1992; Versiani et al., 1992; van Vliet et al., 1994).”
Social phobia in general health care: an unrecognised undertreated disabling disorder
Weiller, E., Bisserbe, J. C., Boyer, P., Lepine, J. P., & Lecrubier, Y. (1996) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.168.2.169 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Lader, M., Stender, K., Bürger, V., & Nil, R. (2004) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.20014 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Walker, J. R., Van Ameringen, M. A., Swinson, R., Bowen, R. C., Chokka, P. R., Goldner, E., Johnston, D. C., Lavallie, Y.-J., Nandy, S., Pecknold, J. C., et al. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/00004714-200012000-00009 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bergamaschi, M. M., Queiroz, R. H. C., Chagas, M. H. N., de Oliveira, D. C. G., De Martinis, B. S., Kapczinski, F., Quevedo, J., Roesler, R., Schröder, N., Nardi, A. E., et al. (2011) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2011.6 · Cited by 771 · see citing works
Andrews, G., Bell, C., Boyce, P., Gale, C., Lampe, L., Marwat, O., Rapee, R., & Wilkins, G. (2018) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867418799453 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
- Authors
- MONTGOMERY, S.
- Corresponding author
- MONTGOMERY, S
- Venue
- European Neuropsychopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 425-433
- ISSN
- 0924-977X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968736851
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- social anxiety disorder, efficacy evaluation, treatment response, moclobemide, dose-response relationship, clinical trial design, consensus recommendations
- MeSH terms
- Age Factors, Clinical Trials as Topic, Generalization, Psychological, Humans, Long-Term Care, Neurobiology, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Research Design, Comorbidity, Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
