Cited by 539Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Mini-SPIN: A brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder

Connor, Kathryn M., Kobak, Kenneth A., Churchill, L. Erik, Katzelnick, David, Davidson, Jonathan R. T.·2001·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to develop a brief self-rated screening instrument for generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD) and to test the efficiency of the instrument. The Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN), a 17-item self-administered scale for GSAD, was given to 263 individuals with GSAD and controls. A subset of three items yielding high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of GSAD was identified. This abbreviated version of the SPIN (Mini-SPIN) was administered to a group of managed care patients in conjunction with an epidemiological study of GSAD. Patients (n = 7,165) were sent a questionnaire comprising the Mini-SPIN and a brief depression screener. Respondents screening positive for GSAD on the Mini-SPIN (n = 344) were interviewed using the social phobia module of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) to verify the diagnosis. A random sample of those who screened negative for GSAD on the Mini-SPIN were administered a similar interview to identify two control groups without GSAD for comparison (n = 673). With this information, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the Mini-SPIN were determined (weighted for sampling). Using a cutoff score of 6 or greater, the Mini-SPIN demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.7%, specificity of 90.0%, positive predictive value of 52.5%, and negative predictive value of 98.5%. The scale possessed 90% accuracy (efficiency) in diagnosing the presence or absence of GSAD in a managed care population. The Mini-SPIN demonstrates good efficiency, supporting its utility as a screening tool for generalized social anxiety disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.1055

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MINI-SPIN cut-off score has high sensitivity and specificity for detection of SAD.

    “Using this cut-off score, the MINI-SPIN has been previously shown to provide high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of SAD (de Lima Osório et al, 2007; Connor et al, 2001).”
  • The Mini-SPIN is a three item, self-report screener for generalized social anxiety disorder.

    “The Mini-SPIN–based on an item analysis of the Social Phobia Inventory (see Connor et al. 2001, for psychometric data)–is a three item, self-report screener for generalized social anxiety disorder.”

    From Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Connor et al. 2001

  • The ASD sample reported significantly higher levels of social anxiety than the non-ASD sample on the mini-SPIN.

    “They also reported significantly higher levels of social anxiety, t (240) = 5.57, p < .001.”

    From Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Connor et al. 2001

  • The expected group differences emerged on the empathy and social anxiety scales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and the mini-SPIN, yet these measures were uncorrelated with the A-ToM social scale.

    “Second, the expected group differences emerged on the empathy and social anxiety scales of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index and the mini-SPIN, yet these measures were uncorrelated with the A-ToM social scale.”

    From Measuring Theory of Mind in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder (2017) · cites this paper as Connor et al. 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Connor, K. M., Kobak, K. A., Churchill, L. E., Katzelnick, D., & Davidson, J. R. T.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Dean Foundation (IN)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Connor, Kathryn M.
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
137-140
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W1967583124
Cited by
537
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 18
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
generalized social anxiety disorder, Social Phobia Inventory, screening tool, diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Phobic Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Reference Values, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review