Cited by 71Treatment of Major DepressionMemory and Neural MechanismsStress Responses and Cortisol

Preclinical research on stress, memory, and the brain in the development of pharmacotherapy for depression

Diamond, David M., Campbell, Adam, Park, Collin R., Vouimba, Rose-Marie·2004·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

We have reviewed two areas of research on stress, memory, and synaptic plasticity which may be relevant toward understanding the neurobiology of major depressive disorder (MDD). First, we have presented the view that the hippocampus (HC) and prefrontal cortex (PFC) function jointly as a memory system which enables multitask processing (working memory) and consolidation of contextual information. The amygdala, by contrast, is necessary for the consolidation of emotional memories. Cognitive and neurophysiological studies have shown that HC-PFC processing is impaired, and amygdaloid processing is enhanced, by stress and in anxiety and mood disorders, including MDD. Second, we have reviewed research on the behavioral and neurophysiological actions of tianeptine, an antidepressant that is known to block the adverse effects of chronic stress on hippocampal morphology. Recent work has shown that acute tianeptine enhances cognitive and electrophysiological measures of HC-PFC functioning without interfering with the emotion-induced enhancement of amygdaloid functioning in rodents. We conclude with a synthesis of the preclinical and clinical literature on stress, memory, and tianeptine with the proposal that tianeptine should enhance HC-PFC memory-related processing in people under stress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.09.003

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Diamond, D. M., Campbell, A., Park, C. R., & Vouimba, R.-M.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Diamond, David M.
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
14
Pages
S491-S495
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008049551
Cited by
71
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Servier
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
major depressive disorder, chronic stress, memory consolidation, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, emotional memory, synaptic plasticity, tianeptine, antidepressants, hippocampal morphology, working memory, stress-induced memory impairment
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic, Brain, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Memory, Stress, Physiological, Thiazepines, Long-Term Potentiation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review