Cited by 123Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

European, randomized, phase 3 study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Coghill, David, Banaschewski, Tobias, Lecendreux, Michel, Soutullo, Cesar, Johnson, Mats, Zuddas, Alessandro, Anderson, Colleen, Civil, Richard +3 more·2013·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) compared with placebo in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Europe. Osmotic-release oral system methylphenidate (OROS-MPH) was included as a reference arm. Patients (6-17 years old) with a baseline ADHD Rating Scale version IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score ≥ 28 were randomized (1:1:1) to dose-optimized LDX (30, 50, or 70 mg/day), OROS-MPH (18, 36, or 54 mg/day) or placebo for 7 weeks. Primary and key secondary efficacy measures were the investigator-rated ADHD-RS-IV and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) rating, respectively. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), electrocardiograms, and vital signs. Of 336 patients randomized, 196 completed the study. The difference between LDX and placebo in least squares mean change in ADHD-RS-IV total score from baseline to endpoint was -18.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -21.5 to -15.7) (p<0.001; effect size, 1.80). The difference between OROS-MPH and placebo in least squares mean change in ADHD-RS-IV total score from baseline to endpoint was -13.0 (95% CI: -15.9 to -10.2) (p<0.001; effect size, 1.26). The proportions (95% CI) of patients showing improvement (CGI-I of 1 or 2) at endpoint were 78% (70-86), 14% (8-21), and 61% (51-70) for LDX, placebo, and OROS-MPH. The most common TEAEs for LDX were decreased appetite, headache, and insomnia. Mean changes in vital signs were modest and consistent with the known profile of LDX. LDX was effective and generally well tolerated in children and adolescents with ADHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2012.11.012

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Banaschewski, T., Coghill, D., Santosh, P., Zuddas, A., Asherson, P., Buitelaar, J., Danckaerts, M., Dopfner, M., Faraone, S.V., Rothenberger, A., Sergeant, J., Steinhausen, H.C., Sonuga- Barke, E.J., Taylor, E., 2006. Long-acting medications for the hyperkinetic disorders. A systematic review and European treatment guideline. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 15, 476-495.
  2. NHS Quality Improvement Scotland, 2008. Attention Deficit and Hyperkinetic Disorders. Services Over Scotland. Report of the Implementation Review Exercise. Edinburgh, UK, p. 11876. /http://www.healthcareimprovementscotland.org/default.aspx?S (accessed 16.05.2012).
  3. Polanczyk, G., de Lima, M.S., Horta, B.L., Biederman, J., Rohde, L.A., 2007. The worldwide prevalence of ADHD: a systematic review and metaregression analysis. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 942-948.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coghill, D., Banaschewski, T., Lecendreux, M., Soutullo, C., Johnson, M., Zuddas, A., Anderson, C., Civil, R., Higgins, N., Lyne, A., & Squires, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Hôpital Robert-Debré (FR)
  • Drottning Silvias barn- och ungdomssjukhus (SE)
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
  • Shire (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Coghill, David
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
1208-1218
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086997214
Cited by
123
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 9
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children and adolescents, OROS methylphenidate, ADHD-RS-IV, treatment efficacy, drug safety, stimulant medication, adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiogram
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Appetite Regulation, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child Behavior, Dextroamphetamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Drug Resistance, Europe, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Methylphenidate, Patient Dropouts, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review