The placebo-nocebo response: controversies and challenges from clinical and research perspective
Abstract
Placebo and nocebo responses fascinate, confuse, mystify and challenge. They are genuine social, cultural and psychobiological phenomena which can significantly modify the overall treatment outcome. The placebo-nocebo phenomenon represents a very good model for our better understanding the role of treatment context and how the words, indices, symbols and icons act on our brains. Placebo response is associated with reward expectancy and relief of anticipatory anxiety, while nocebo response is related to lack of reward/positive expectancy and to increase of anticipatory anxiety. Placebo-nocebo responses are mediated through changes in various cortico-subcortical networks and psychophysiological systems. In spite of many existing complementary theories and still growing research on placebo and nocebo response, the implementation of our current knowledge to benefit basic research, clinical trials and routine clinical practice is still so scarce.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Placebo rates are high in medication trials for depression.
“Though placebo rates are high in medication trials for depression [78]”
From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [78]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Jakovljevic, M.
- Venue
- European Neuropsychopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 333-341
- ISSN
- 0924-977X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034841531
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- placebo response, nocebo effect, reward expectancy, anticipatory anxiety, treatment context, cortico-subcortical networks, clinical trials, clinical practice
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Informed Consent, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Placebo Effect, Evidence-Based Medicine, Nocebo Effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review