Cited by 63Pain Management and Placebo EffectTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesPain Mechanisms and Treatments

The placebo-nocebo response: controversies and challenges from clinical and research perspective

Jakovljevic, Miro·2014·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Placebo and nocebo responses fascinate, confuse, mystify and challenge. They are genuine social, cultural and psychobiological phenomena which can significantly modify the overall treatment outcome. The placebo-nocebo phenomenon represents a very good model for our better understanding the role of treatment context and how the words, indices, symbols and icons act on our brains. Placebo response is associated with reward expectancy and relief of anticipatory anxiety, while nocebo response is related to lack of reward/positive expectancy and to increase of anticipatory anxiety. Placebo-nocebo responses are mediated through changes in various cortico-subcortical networks and psychophysiological systems. In spite of many existing complementary theories and still growing research on placebo and nocebo response, the implementation of our current knowledge to benefit basic research, clinical trials and routine clinical practice is still so scarce.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.11.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Placebo rates are high in medication trials for depression.

    “Though placebo rates are high in medication trials for depression [78]”

    From Deep brain stimulation for depression. (2022) · cites this paper as [78]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 63

Authors
Jakovljevic, M.
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
333-341
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034841531
Cited by
63
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
placebo response, nocebo effect, reward expectancy, anticipatory anxiety, treatment context, cortico-subcortical networks, clinical trials, clinical practice
MeSH terms
Brain, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Informed Consent, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Placebo Effect, Evidence-Based Medicine, Nocebo Effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review