Cited by 48Schizophrenia research and treatmentCardiac Health and Mental HealthBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Long-term metabolic and cardiovascular effects of antipsychotic drugs. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Rotella, Francesco, Cassioli, Emanuele, Calderani, Enrico, Lazzeretti, Lisa, Ragghianti, Benedetta, Ricca, Valdo, Mannucci, Edoardo·2020·European Neuropsychopharmacology

Abstract

Most of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on antipsychotics (APs) have efficacy as their primary endpoint, leading to a lack of evidence on long-term metabolic effects of APs. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to compare different APs for the long-term modification of risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and related mortality, in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. All RCTs found on Medline/Embase of at least 52 weeks up to 19 December 2017, enrolling patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia and comparing an AP with another AP or placebo were included. The primary outcome of this analysis was the association of APs with the incidence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. 3013 studies were screened, 92 met the selection criteria. MI, stroke and cardiovascular death were reported in 11, 6 and 24 studies, respectively. No significant difference was observed with respect to MI and Stroke; a significantly higher cardiovascular mortality was observed for sertindole when compared to risperidone (Mantel-Haenszel Odds Ratio: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.33 - 5). Long-term cardiovascular effects of APs deserve to be studied more extensively. The request by regulatory authorities of cardiovascular safety data from specifically designed trials would be useful.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.12.118

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Profound metabolic side effects, including weight gain, increased chance of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and high blood pressure, are also common with risperidone and aripiprazole.

    “Profound metabolic side effects, including weight gain, increased chance of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and high blood pressure, are also common with risperidone and aripiprazole [139–141].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rotella, F., Cassioli, E., Calderani, E., Lazzeretti, L., Ragghianti, B., Ricca, V., & Mannucci, E.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
  • University of Florence (IT)
Corresponding author
Rotella, Francesco
Venue
European Neuropsychopharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
32
Pages
56-65
ISSN
0924-977X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000671034
Cited by
48
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Neuropsychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Otsuka Pharmaceutical
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
antipsychotic drugs, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, sertindole, risperidone, metabolic effects, cardiovascular safety
MeSH terms
Bipolar Disorder, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Metabolic Diseases, Schizophrenia, Time Factors, Antipsychotic Agents, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review