Silk based bio-inks for medical applications
Abstract
The manufacturing of tissue engineering scaffolds, which have an incredibly complicated structure, is made possible by 3D printing processes which are heeded as a crucial scientific evolutionism for the customized biomedical field. A mixture of materials and biological molecules or cells used in bioprinting called bio-ink, which are highly hydrated polymeric networks, majorly hydrogels, can imitate the extracellular matrix naturally found in living organisms to encapsulate cells uniformly and can be categorized into organic and artificial polymers. The fabrication of intricate structures with adjustable mechanical properties (Ultimate strength = approx. 300–740 MPa, Young’s modulus = approx. 10–17 GPa), degradation rates, and cytocompatibility is possible with silk fibroin's excellent qualities and adaptability for bio-inks. The review introduces a crucial and critical understanding of silk-based bio-inks in the engineering of cartilage, bone, and skin tissue. The challenges concerning the printability and potential future of silk-based bio-inks in the biomedical field are also covered in this review.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Silk fibroin is a promising material for VML repair because its biocompatible fibrous protein structure mimics native extracellular matrix deficits.
“Silk fibroin (SF) presents a promising material for addressing VML repair as its biocompatible fibrous protein structure mimics native extracellular matrix (ECM) deficits [18–21].”
From Development of silk microfiber-reinforced bioink for muscle tissue engineering and in situ printing by a handheld 3D printer (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kamaraj, M., Rezayof, O., Barer, A., Kim, H., Moghimi, N., Joshi, A., Dokmeci, M. R., Khademhosseini, A., Alambeigi, F., & John, J. V. (2025) · Biomaterials Advances · doi:10.1016/j.bioadv.2024.214057 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Koo, Y., Kim, W., Hwangbo, H., Ryu, D., & Kim, G. (2026) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202503933 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Anant Deshpande, V., Antanitta. S, V., Kore, A., & Kandasubramanian, B.
- Affiliations
- Defence Institute of Advanced Technology (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kandasubramanian, Balasubramanian
- Venue
- European Polymer Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-09
- Volume
- 196
- Pages
- 112255
- ISSN
- 0014-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4381952881
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- European Polymer Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Keywords
- silk fibroin, bioinks, 3D bioprinting, tissue engineering scaffolds, hydrogels, cartilage tissue engineering, bone tissue engineering, skin tissue engineering, printability, mechanical properties, degradation rate, cytocompatibility, extracellular matrix mimicry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review