Cited by 1,521Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningProstate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentProstate Cancer Treatment and Research

International Variation in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates

Center, Melissa M., Jemal, Ahmedin, Lortet-Tieulent, Joannie, Ward, Elizabeth, Ferlay, Jacques, Brawley, Otis, Bray, Freddie·2012·European Urology

Abstract

Context Wide variation exists internationally for prostate cancer (PCa) rates due to differences in detection practices, treatment, and lifestyle and genetic factors. Objective We present contemporary variations in PCa incidence and mortality patterns across five continents using the most recent data from the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Evidence acquisition PCa incidence and mortality estimates for 2008 from GLOBOCAN are presented. We also examine recent trends in PCa incidence rates for 40 countries and mortality rates for 53 countries from 1985 and onward via join-point analyses using an augmented version of Cancer Incidence in Five Continents and the World Health Organization mortality database. Evidence synthesis Estimated PCa incidence rates remain most elevated in the highest resource counties worldwide including North America, Oceania, and western and northern Europe. Mortality rates tend to be higher in less developed regions of the world including parts of South America, the Caribbean, and sub-Saharan Africa. Increasing PCa incidence rates during the most recent decade were observed in 32 of the 40 countries examined, whereas trends tended to stabilize in 8 countries. In contrast, PCa mortality rates decreased in 27 of the 53 countries under study, whereas rates increased in 16 and remained stable in 10 countries. Conclusions PCa incidence rates increased in nearly all countries considered in this analysis except in a few high-income countries. In contrast, the increase in PCa mortality rates mainly occurred in lower resource settings, with declines largely confined to high-resource countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.054

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Center, M. M., Jemal, A., Lortet-Tieulent, J., Ward, E., Ferlay, J., Brawley, O., & Bray, F.
Affiliations
American Cancer Society (US)
Corresponding author
Jemal, Ahmedin
Venue
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
61
Issue
6
Pages
1079-1092
ISSN
0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119391023
Cited by
1,521
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 105 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 135 · 2018: 140 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 160 · 2015: 177 · 2014: 145 · 2013: 109 · 2012: 30
FWCI
72.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Keywords
prostate cancer, cancer incidence, cancer mortality, international variation, incidence trends, mortality trends, GLOBOCAN, Cancer Incidence in Five Continents
MeSH terms
Africa, Asia, Developing Countries, Epidemiology, Europe, Humans, Male, North America, Prognosis, Prostatic Neoplasms, Registries, South America, Time Factors, Incidence, Oceania

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review