The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I
Abstract
PURPOSE: This Guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the surgical management of patients with kidney and/or ureteral stones. The summary presented herein represents Part I of the two-part series dedicated to Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. Please refer to Part II for an in-depth discussion of patients presenting with ureteral or renal stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature (search dates 1/1/1985 to 5/31/2015) was conducted to identify peer-reviewed studies relevant to the surgical management of stones. The review yielded an evidence base of 1,911 articles after application of inclusion/exclusion criteria. These publications were used to create the Guideline statements. Evidence-based statements of Strong, Moderate, or Conditional Recommendation were developed based on benefits and risks/burdens to patients. Additional directives are provided as Clinical Principles and Expert Opinions when insufficient evidence existed. RESULTS: The Panel identified 12 adult Index Patients to represent the most common cases seen in clinical practice. Three additional Index Patients were also created to describe pediatric and pregnant patients with such stones. With these patients in mind, Guideline statements were developed to aid the clinician in identifying optimal management. CONCLUSIONS: Proper treatment selection, which is directed by patient- and stone-specific factors, remains the greatest predictor of successful treatment outcomes. This Guideline is intended for use in conjunction with the individual patient's treatment goals. In all cases, patient preferences and personal goals should be considered when choosing a management strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2014) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 17,633
Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies
Higgins, J. P., & Altman, D. G. (2008) · Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions · doi:10.1002/9780470712184.ch8 · Cited by 3,396
Prevalence of Kidney Stones in the United States
Scales, C. D., Smith, A. C., Hanley, J. M., & Saigal, C. S. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.052 · Cited by 2,581
UROLOGIC DISEASES IN AMERICA PROJECT: UROLITHIASIS
PEARLE, M. S., CALHOUN, E. A., CURHAN, G. C., & the UROLOGIC DISEASES OF AMERICA PROJECT (2005) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000152082.14384.d7 · Cited by 941
Self-citationBest Practice Policy Statement on Urologic Surgery Antimicrobial Prophylaxis
Wolf, J. S., Bennett, C. J., Dmochowski, R. R., Hollenbeck, B. K., Pearle, M. S., & Schaeffer, A. J. (2008) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.068 · Cited by 901
Self-citationURETERAL STONES CLINICAL GUIDELINES PANEL SUMMARY REPORT ON THE MANAGEMENT OF URETERAL CALCULI
Segura, J. W., Preminger, G. M., Assimos, D. G., Dretler, S. P., Kahn, R. I., Lingeman, J. E., & Macaluso, J. N. (1997) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64173-9 · Cited by 745
Self-citationThe Guy's Stone Score—Grading the Complexity of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Procedures
Thomas, K., Smith, N. C., Hegarty, N., & Glass, J. M. (2011) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.026 · Cited by 465
Helical CT of the Body: Are Settings Adjusted for Pediatric Patients?
Paterson, A., Frush, D. P., & Donnelly, L. F. (2001) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.176.2.1760297 · Cited by 422
Low-Dose Versus Standard-Dose CT Protocol in Patients with Clinically Suspected Renal Colic
Poletti, P.-A., Platon, A., Rutschmann, O. T., Schmidlin, F. R., Iselin, C. E., & Becker, C. D. (2007) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.06.0793 · Cited by 371
Metadata
- Authors
- Assimos, D., Krambeck, A., Miller, N. L., Monga, M., Murad, M. H., Nelson, C. P., Pace, K. T., Pais, V. M., Pearle, M. S., Preminger, G. M., Razvi, H., Shah, O., & Matlaga, B. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 196
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1153-1160
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2403072155
- Cited by
- 1,457
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 83.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090
- The paper
- Assimos, D., Krambeck, A., Miller, N. L., Monga, M., Murad, M. H., Nelson, C. P., Pace, K. T., Pais, V. M., Pearle, M. S., Preminger, G. M., Razvi, H., Shah, O., & Matlaga, B. R. (2016). Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.