Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion–targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes

Open access
Meng, Xiaosong, Rosenkrantz, Andrew B., Mendhiratta, Neil, Fenstermaker, Michael, Huang, Richard, Wysock, James S., Bjurlin, Marc A., Marshall, Susan, Deng, Fang-Ming, Zhou, Ming, Melamed, Jonathan, Huang, William C., Lepor, Herbert, Taneja, Samir S.·2016·European Urology

Abstract

BACKGROUND Increasing evidence supports the use of MRI-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy (MRF-TB) to improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) while limiting detection of indolent disease compared to systematic 12-core biopsy (SB). OBJECTIVE We report results of MRF-TB and SB and the relationship between biopsy outcomes and pre-biopsy MRI in 601 men presenting to our center. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Retrospective analysis of a prospectively acquired cohort of men presenting for prostate biopsy over a 26-month period. A total of 601 of 803 consecutively eligible men were included. INTERVENTIONS All men were offered pre-biopsy MRI and assigned a maximum MRI suspicion score (mSS). Men with an MRI abnormality underwent combined MRF-TB and SB. OUTCOMES Detection rate of all PCa and high-grade PCa (Gleason score (GS)≥7) were compared by McNemar's test. RESULTS MRF-TB detected fewer GS6 PCa (75 vs 121, p<0.001) and more GS≥7 PCa (158 vs 117, p<0.001) than SB. Increasing mSS was associated with increasing detection of GS≥7 PCa (p<0.001), but had no relationship to the detection of GS6 PCa. The prediction of GS≥7 disease by mSS varied according to biopsy history. Compared to SB, MRF-TB identified more GS≥7 cancer in men with no prior biopsy (88 vs 72, p=0.012), with prior negative biopsy (28 vs 16, p=0.010), and with prior cancer diagnosis (42 vs 29, p=0.043). MRF-TB detected fewer GS6 cancers in men with no prior biopsy (32 vs 60, p<.001) and prior cancer (30 vs 46, p=0.034). Limitations include retrospective design and potential for selection bias given a referral population. CONCLUSIONS MRI-US fusion-targeted biopsy detects more high-grade cancer than systematic biopsy while limiting detection of GS6 cancer in men presenting for prostate biopsy. These findings suggest that pre-biopsy mpMRI and MRF-TB should be considered in all men undergoing prostate biopsy and, in conjunction with biopsy indication, mSS may ultimately help identify a select group of men at low risk of high-grade cancer in whom prostate biopsy may not be warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.005

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Meng, X., Rosenkrantz, A. B., Mendhiratta, N., Fenstermaker, M., Huang, R., Wysock, J. S., Bjurlin, M. A., Marshall, S., Deng, F.-M., Zhou, M., Melamed, J., Huang, W. C., Lepor, H., & Taneja, S. S.
Venue
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
69
Issue
3
Pages
512-517
ISSN
0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W778629108
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
26.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion–targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.005
The paper
Meng, X., Rosenkrantz, A. B., Mendhiratta, N., Fenstermaker, M., Huang, R., Wysock, J. S., Bjurlin, M. A., Marshall, S., Deng, F.-M., Zhou, M., Melamed, J., Huang, W. C., Lepor, H., & Taneja, S. S. (2016). Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion–targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.