The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer: Practical Guidelines for Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Evaluations of Multiorgan Involvement in Advanced Prostate Cancer
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Comparative reviews of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT; with different radiotracers) have shown that metastasis detection in advanced cancers is more accurate than with currently used CT and bone scans. However, the ability of WB-MRI and positron emission tomography/CT to assess therapeutic benefits has not been comprehensively evaluated. There is also considerable variability in the availability and quality of WB-MRI, which is an impediment to clinical development. Expert recommendations for standardising WB-MRI scans are needed, in order to assess its performance in advanced prostate cancer (APC) clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To design recommendations that promote standardisation and diminish variations in the acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of WB-MRI scans for use in APC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: An international expert panel of oncologic imagers and oncologists with clinical and research interests in APC management assessed biomarker requirements for clinical care and clinical trials. Key requirements for a workable WB-MRI protocol, achievable quality standards, and interpretation criteria were identified and synthesised in a white paper. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer guidelines were formulated for use in all oncologic manifestations of APC. CONCLUSIONS: Uniformity in imaging data acquisition, quality, and interpretation of WB-MRI are essential for assessing the test performance of WB-MRI. The METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer standard requires validation in clinical trials of treatment approaches in APC. PATIENT SUMMARY: METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer represents the consensus recommendations on the performance, quality standards, and reporting of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging, for use in all oncologic manifestations of advanced prostate cancer. These new criteria require validation in clinical trials of established and new treatment approaches in advanced prostate cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Abiraterone and Increased Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
de Bono, J. S., Logothetis, C. J., Molina, A., Fizazi, K., North, S., Chu, L., Chi, K. N., Jones, R. J., Goodman, O. B., Saad, F., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1014618 · Cited by 4,407 · cited 1×
“[28]; Beer et al.”
Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer
Robinson, D., Van Allen, E. M., Wu, Y.-M., Schultz, N., Lonigro, R. J., Mosquera, J.-M., Montgomery, B., Taplin, M.-E., Pritchard, C. C., Attard, G., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.001 · Cited by 3,645
Self-citationAlpha Emitter Radium-223 and Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Parker, C., Nilsson, S., Heinrich, D., Helle, S. I., O'Sullivan, J. M., Fosså, S. D., Chodacki, A., Wiechno, P., Logue, J., Seke, M., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1213755 · Cited by 3,408
Enzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer before Chemotherapy
Beer, T. M., Armstrong, A. J., Rathkopf, D. E., Loriot, Y., Sternberg, C. N., Higano, C. S., Iversen, P., Bhattacharya, S., Carles, J., Chowdhury, S., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1405095 · Cited by 3,028
Ryan, C. J., Smith, M. R., Fizazi, K., Saad, F., Mulders, P. F. A., Sternberg, C. N., Miller, K., Logothetis, C. J., Shore, N. D., Small, E. J., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71205-7 · Cited by 1,369
Cited by
Messiou, C., Hillengass, J., Delorme, S., Lecouvet, F. E., Moulopoulos, L. A., Collins, D. J., Blackledge, M. D., Abildgaard, N., Østergaard, B., Schlemmer, H.-P., et al. (2019) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2019181949 · Cited by 328
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Padhani, A. R., Lecouvet, F. E., Tunariu, N., Koh, D.-M., De Keyzer, F., Collins, D. J., Sala, E., Schlemmer, H. P., Petralia, G., Vargas, H. A., Fanti, S., Tombal, H. B., & de Bono, J.
- Venue
- European Urology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-92
- ISSN
- 0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2423859833
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 21.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer: Practical Guidelines for Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Evaluations of Multiorgan Involvement in Advanced Prostate Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.033
- The paper
- Padhani, A. R., Lecouvet, F. E., Tunariu, N., Koh, D.-M., De Keyzer, F., Collins, D. J., Sala, E., Schlemmer, H. P., Petralia, G., Vargas, H. A., Fanti, S., Tombal, H. B., & de Bono, J. (2017). METastasis Reporting and Data System for Prostate Cancer: Practical Guidelines for Acquisition, Interpretation, and Reporting of Whole-body Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Evaluations of Multiorgan Involvement in Advanced Prostate Cancer. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
