The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictors of Positive 68 Ga–Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gotzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700 · Cited by 17,648
QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies
Whiting, P. F., Rutjes, A. W. S., Westwood, M. E., Mallett, S., Deeks, J. J., Reitsma, J. B., Leeflang, M. M. G., Sterne, J. A. C., Bossuyt, P. M. M., & the QUADAS-2 Group* (2011) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 · Cited by 14,199
Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data
Nyaga, V. N., Arbyn, M., & Aerts, M. (2014) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/2049-3258-72-39 · Cited by 2,139
Cited by
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: Joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0
Fendler, W. P., Eiber, M., Beheshti, M., Bomanji, J., Ceci, F., Cho, S., Giesel, F., Haberkorn, U., Hope, T. A., Kopka, K., et al. (2017) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-017-3670-z · Cited by 750
Eiber, M., Herrmann, K., Calais, J., Hadaschik, B., Giesel, F. L., Hartenbach, M., Hope, T., Reiter, R., Maurer, T., Weber, W. A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.117.198119 · Cited by 626
Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Heterogeneity and DNA Repair Defects in Prostate Cancer
Paschalis, A., Sheehan, B., Riisnaes, R., Rodrigues, D. N., Gurel, B., Bertan, C., Ferreira, A., Lambros, M. B. K., Seed, G., Yuan, W., et al. (2019) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.06.030 · Cited by 455
Siva, S., Bressel, M., Murphy, D. G., Shaw, M., Chander, S., Violet, J., Tai, K. H., Udovicich, C., Lim, A., Selbie, L., et al. (2018) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.004 · Cited by 322
Self-citationFendler, W. P., Weber, M., Iravani, A., Hofman, M. S., Calais, J., Czernin, J., Ilhan, H., Saad, F., Small, E. J., Smith, M. R., et al. (2019) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1050 · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Perera, M., Papa, N., Christidis, D., Wetherell, D., Hofman, M. S., Murphy, D. G., Bolton, D., & Lawrentschuk, N.
- Venue
- European Urology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 926-937
- ISSN
- 0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2470255787
- Cited by
- 1,007
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 33.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictors of Positive 68 Ga–Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.021
- The paper
- Perera, M., Papa, N., Christidis, D., Wetherell, D., Hofman, M. S., Murphy, D. G., Bolton, D., & Lawrentschuk, N. (2016). Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictors of Positive 68 Ga–Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.021
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
