Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,514

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2017 Update

Rouprêt, Morgan, Babjuk, Marko, Compérat, Eva, Zigeuner, Richard, Sylvester, Richard J., Burger, Maximilian, Cowan, Nigel C., Gontero, Paolo, Van Rhijn, Bas W.G., Mostafid, A. Hugh, Palou, Joan, Shariat, Shahrokh F.·2018·European Urology

Abstract

CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer; urothelial carcinomas; upper urinary tract, carcinoma; renal pelvis; ureter; bladder cancer; chemotherapy; ureteroscopy; nephroureterectomy; adjuvant treatment; instillation; recurrence; risk factors; and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations (ie, grade A). However, the results of recent multicentre studies are now available, and there is a growing number of retrospective articles in UTUC. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification, as well as for radical and conservative treatment; prognostic factors are also discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after radical nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumours and two functional kidneys. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis; appropriate diagnosis and management is most important. We present recommendations based on current evidence for optimal management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.036

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 70 references

Cited by

See all 1,514

Metadata

Authors
Rouprêt, M., Babjuk, M., Compérat, E., Zigeuner, R., Sylvester, R. J., Burger, M., Cowan, N. C., Gontero, P., Van Rhijn, B. W. G., Mostafid, A. H., Palou, J., & Shariat, S. F.
Venue
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
73
Issue
1
Pages
111-122
ISSN
0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4249552371
Cited by
1,514
References
70
FWCI
104.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2017 Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.036
The paper
Rouprêt, M., Babjuk, M., Compérat, E., Zigeuner, R., Sylvester, R. J., Burger, M., Cowan, N. C., Gontero, P., Van Rhijn, B. W. G., Mostafid, A. H., Palou, J., & Shariat, S. F. (2018). European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2017 Update. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.036

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.