Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies

Open access
Gandaglia, Giorgio, Ploussard, Guillaume, Valerio, Massimo, Mattei, Agostino, Fiori, Cristian, Fossati, Nicola, Stabile, Armando, Beauval, Jean-Baptiste, Malavaud, Bernard, Roumiguié, Mathieu, Robesti, Daniele, Dell’Oglio, Paolo, Moschini, Marco, Zamboni, Stefania, Rakauskas, Arnas, De Cobelli, Francesco, Porpiglia, Francesco, Montorsi, Francesco, Briganti, Alberto·2019·European Urology

Abstract

BACKGROUND Available models for predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) might not be applicable to men diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies. OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy of available tools to predict LNI and to develop a novel model for men diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 497 patients diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies and treated with RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) at five institutions were retrospectively identified. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES Three available models predicting LNI were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analyses. A nomogram predicting LNI was developed and internally validated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 62 patients (12.5%) had LNI. The median number of nodes removed was 15. The AUC for the Briganti 2012, Briganti 2017, and MSKCC nomograms was 82%, 82%, and 81%, respectively, and their calibration characteristics were suboptimal. A model including PSA, clinical stage and maximum diameter of the index lesion on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), grade group on targeted biopsy, and the presence of clinically significant PCa on concomitant systematic biopsy had an AUC of 86% and represented the basis for a coefficient-based nomogram. This tool exhibited a higher AUC and higher net benefit compared to available models developed using standard biopsies. Using a cutoff of 7%, 244 ePLNDs (57%) would be spared and a lower number of LNIs would be missed compared to available nomograms (1.6% vs 4.6% vs 4.5% vs 4.2% for the new nomogram vs Briganti 2012 vs Briganti 2017 vs MSKCC). CONCLUSIONS Available models predicting LNI are characterized by suboptimal accuracy and clinical net benefit for patients diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies. A novel nomogram including mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsy data should be used to identify candidates for ePLND in this setting. PATIENT SUMMARY We developed the first nomogram to predict lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer patients diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy undergoing radical prostatectomy. Adoption of this model to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection could avoid up to 60% of these procedures at the cost of missing only 1.6% patients with LNI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 322

Metadata

Authors
Gandaglia, G., Ploussard, G., Valerio, M., Mattei, A., Fiori, C., Fossati, N., Stabile, A., Beauval, J.-B., Malavaud, B., Roumiguié, M., Robesti, D., Dell’Oglio, P., Moschini, M., Zamboni, S., Rakauskas, A., De Cobelli, F., Porpiglia, F., Montorsi, F., & Briganti, A.
Venue
European Urology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
75
Issue
3
Pages
506-514
ISSN
0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896430583
Cited by
322
References
17
FWCI
15.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012
The paper
Gandaglia, G., Ploussard, G., Valerio, M., Mattei, A., Fiori, C., Fossati, N., Stabile, A., Beauval, J.-B., Malavaud, B., Roumiguié, M., Robesti, D., Dell’Oglio, P., Moschini, M., Zamboni, S., Rakauskas, A., De Cobelli, F., Porpiglia, F., Montorsi, F., & Briganti, A. (2019). A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.