The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Available models for predicting lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) might not be applicable to men diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies. OBJECTIVE To assess the accuracy of available tools to predict LNI and to develop a novel model for men diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 497 patients diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies and treated with RP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) at five institutions were retrospectively identified. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES Three available models predicting LNI were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analyses. A nomogram predicting LNI was developed and internally validated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 62 patients (12.5%) had LNI. The median number of nodes removed was 15. The AUC for the Briganti 2012, Briganti 2017, and MSKCC nomograms was 82%, 82%, and 81%, respectively, and their calibration characteristics were suboptimal. A model including PSA, clinical stage and maximum diameter of the index lesion on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), grade group on targeted biopsy, and the presence of clinically significant PCa on concomitant systematic biopsy had an AUC of 86% and represented the basis for a coefficient-based nomogram. This tool exhibited a higher AUC and higher net benefit compared to available models developed using standard biopsies. Using a cutoff of 7%, 244 ePLNDs (57%) would be spared and a lower number of LNIs would be missed compared to available nomograms (1.6% vs 4.6% vs 4.5% vs 4.2% for the new nomogram vs Briganti 2012 vs Briganti 2017 vs MSKCC). CONCLUSIONS Available models predicting LNI are characterized by suboptimal accuracy and clinical net benefit for patients diagnosed via MRI-targeted biopsies. A novel nomogram including mpMRI and MRI-targeted biopsy data should be used to identify candidates for ePLND in this setting. PATIENT SUMMARY We developed the first nomogram to predict lymph node invasion (LNI) in prostate cancer patients diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy undergoing radical prostatectomy. Adoption of this model to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection could avoid up to 60% of these procedures at the cost of missing only 1.6% patients with LNI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models
Vickers, A. J., & Elkin, E. B. (2006) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x06295361 · Cited by 6,341
Ahmed, H. U., El-Shater Bosaily, A., Brown, L. C., Gabe, R., Kaplan, R., Parmar, M. K., Collaco-Moraes, Y., Ward, K., Hindley, R. G., Freeman, A., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32401-1 · Cited by 3,284
Mottet, N., Bellmunt, J., Bolla, M., Briers, E., Cumberbatch, M. G., De Santis, M., Fossati, N., Gross, T., Henry, A. M., Joniau, S., et al. (2017) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.003 · Cited by 3,227
Self-citationMRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis
Kasivisvanathan, V., Rannikko, A. S., Borghi, M., Panebianco, V., Mynderse, L. A., Vaarala, M. H., Briganti, A., Budäus, L., Hellawell, G., Hindley, R. G., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1801993 · Cited by 3,091
Self-citationESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
Barentsz, J. O., Richenberg, J., Clements, R., Choyke, P., Verma, S., Villeirs, G., Rouviere, O., Logager, V., & Fütterer, J. J. (2012) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y · Cited by 2,438
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score
Epstein, J. I., Zelefsky, M. J., Sjoberg, D. D., Nelson, J. B., Egevad, L., Magi-Galluzzi, C., Vickers, A. J., Parwani, A. V., Reuter, V. E., Fine, S. W., et al. (2016) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046 · Cited by 1,374
Hövels, A. M., Heesakkers, R. A. M., Adang, E. M., Jager, G. J., Strum, S., Hoogeveen, Y. L., Severens, J. L., & Barentsz, J. O. (2008) · Clinical Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.crad.2007.05.022 · Cited by 954
Briganti, A., Larcher, A., Abdollah, F., Capitanio, U., Gallina, A., Suardi, N., Bianchi, M., Sun, M., Freschi, M., Salonia, A., et al. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.044 · Cited by 786
Self-citationSchoots, I. G., Roobol, M. J., Nieboer, D., Bangma, C. H., Steyerberg, E. W., & Hunink, M. G. M. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.037 · Cited by 687
Barentsz, J. O., Weinreb, J. C., Verma, S., Thoeny, H. C., Tempany, C. M., Shtern, F., Padhani, A. R., Margolis, D., Macura, K. J., Haider, M. A., et al. (2016) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.038 · Cited by 547
Cited by
E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET
Ceci, F., Oprea-Lager, D. E., Emmett, L., Adam, J. A., Bomanji, J., Czernin, J., Eiber, M., Haberkorn, U., Hofman, M. S., Hope, T. A., et al. (2021) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-021-05245-y · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- Gandaglia, G., Ploussard, G., Valerio, M., Mattei, A., Fiori, C., Fossati, N., Stabile, A., Beauval, J.-B., Malavaud, B., Roumiguié, M., Robesti, D., Dell’Oglio, P., Moschini, M., Zamboni, S., Rakauskas, A., De Cobelli, F., Porpiglia, F., Montorsi, F., & Briganti, A.
- Venue
- European Urology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 506-514
- ISSN
- 0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2896430583
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 15.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012
- The paper
- Gandaglia, G., Ploussard, G., Valerio, M., Mattei, A., Fiori, C., Fossati, N., Stabile, A., Beauval, J.-B., Malavaud, B., Roumiguié, M., Robesti, D., Dell’Oglio, P., Moschini, M., Zamboni, S., Rakauskas, A., De Cobelli, F., Porpiglia, F., Montorsi, F., & Briganti, A. (2019). A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.