The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: The aim was to develop clinical guidelines for multi-parametric MRI of the prostate by a group of prostate MRI experts from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), based on literature evidence and consensus expert opinion. True evidence-based guidelines could not be formulated, but a compromise, reflected by "minimal" and "optimal" requirements has been made. The scope of these ESUR guidelines is to promulgate high quality MRI in acquisition and evaluation with the correct indications for prostate cancer across the whole of Europe and eventually outside Europe. The guidelines for the optimal technique and three protocols for "detection", "staging" and "node and bone" are presented. The use of endorectal coil vs. pelvic phased array coil and 1.5 vs. 3 T is discussed. Clinical indications and a PI-RADS classification for structured reporting are presented. KEY POINTS: This report provides guidelines for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer. Clinical indications, and minimal and optimal imaging acquisition protocols are provided. A structured reporting system (PI-RADS) is described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jemal, A., Siegel, R., Ward, E., Hao, Y., Xu, J., & Thun, M. J. (2009) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20006 · Cited by 9,709
Cited by
Turkbey, B., Rosenkrantz, A. B., Haider, M. A., Padhani, A. R., Villeirs, G., Macura, K. J., Tempany, C. M., Choyke, P. L., Cornud, F., Margolis, D. J., et al. (2019) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033 · Cited by 2,544
Self-citationEvaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for mri: The promise12 challenge
Litjens, G., Toth, R., van de Ven, W., Hoeks, C., Kerkstra, S., van Ginneken, B., Vincent, G., Guillard, G., Birbeck, N., Zhang, J., et al. (2014) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2013.12.002 · Cited by 857
Accuracy of Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Meta-Analysis
de Rooij, M., Hamoen, E. H. J., Fütterer, J. J., Barentsz, J. O., & Rovers, M. M. (2014) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.13.11046 · Cited by 470
Self-citationWibmer, A., Hricak, H., Gondo, T., Matsumoto, K., Veeraraghavan, H., Fehr, D., Zheng, J., Goldman, D., Moskowitz, C., Fine, S. W., et al. (2015) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3701-8 · Cited by 391
Gandaglia, G., Ploussard, G., Valerio, M., Mattei, A., Fiori, C., Fossati, N., Stabile, A., Beauval, J.-B., Malavaud, B., Roumiguié, M., et al. (2019) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Barentsz, J. O., Richenberg, J., Clements, R., Choyke, P., Verma, S., Villeirs, G., Rouviere, O., Logager, V., & Fütterer, J. J.
- Venue
- European Radiology
- Published
- 2012-02-10
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 746-757
- ISSN
- 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1084
- OpenAlex
- W2124539070
- Cited by
- 2,438
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 155.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y
- The paper
- Barentsz, J. O., Richenberg, J., Clements, R., Choyke, P., Verma, S., Villeirs, G., Rouviere, O., Logager, V., & Fütterer, J. J. (2012). ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. European Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
