The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) Guideline Panel has prepared evidence-based guidelines and recommendations for the management of RCC. OBJECTIVE To provide an updated RCC guideline based on standardised methodology including systematic reviews, which is robust, transparent, reproducible, and reliable. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION For the 2019 update, evidence synthesis was undertaken based on a comprehensive and structured literature assessment for new and relevant data. Where necessary, formal systematic reviews adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were undertaken. Relevant databases (Medline, Cochrane Libraries, trial registries, conference proceedings) were searched until June 2018, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective or controlled studies with a comparator arm, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Where relevant, risk of bias (RoB) assessment, and qualitative and quantitative syntheses of the evidence were performed. The remaining sections of the document were updated following a structured literature assessment. Clinical practice recommendations were developed and issued based on the modified GRADE framework. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS All chapters of the RCC guidelines were updated based on a structured literature assessment, for prioritised topics based on the availability of robust data. For RCTs, RoB was low across studies. For most non-RCTs, clinical and methodological heterogeneity prevented pooling of data. The majority of included studies were retrospective with matched or unmatched cohorts, based on single- or multi-institutional data or national registries. The exception was for the treatment of metastatic RCC, for which there were several large RCTs, resulting in recommendations based on higher levels of evidence. CONCLUSIONS The 2019 RCC guidelines have been updated by the multidisciplinary panel using the highest methodological standards. These guidelines provide the most reliable contemporary evidence base for the management of RCC in 2019. PATIENT SUMMARY The European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma Guideline Panel has thoroughly evaluated the available research data on kidney cancer to establish international standards for the care of kidney cancer patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma
Motzer, R. J., Tannir, N. M., McDermott, D. F., Arén Frontera, O., Melichar, B., Choueiri, T. K., Plimack, E. R., Barthélémy, P., Porta, C., George, S., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1712126 · Cited by 4,656
Self-citationMoch, H., Cubilla, A. L., Humphrey, P. A., Reuter, V. E., & Ulbright, T. M. (2016) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.029 · Cited by 3,086
Ferlay, J., Colombet, M., Soerjomataram, I., Dyba, T., Randi, G., Bettio, M., Gavin, A., Visser, O., & Bray, F. (2018) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2018.07.005 · Cited by 2,478
Going from evidence to recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Vist, G. E., Liberati, A., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39493.646875.ae · Cited by 1,810
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of Percutaneous Renal Tumour Biopsy
Marconi, L., Dabestani, S., Lam, T. B., Hofmann, F., Stewart, F., Norrie, J., Bex, A., Bensalah, K., Canfield, S. E., Hora, M., et al. (2016) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.072 · Cited by 601
Self-citationActive surveillance of small renal masses: progression patterns of early stage kidney cancer.
Jewett, M., Mattar, K., Basiuk, J., et al. (2011) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.030 · Cited by 473
Blom, J. H. M., van Poppel, H., Maréchal, J., Didier Jacqmin, D., Schröder, F. H., de Prijck, L., & Sylvester, R. J. (2008) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.052 · Cited by 436
Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma
Ljungberg, B., Hanbury, D. C., Kuczyk, M. A., Merseburger, A. S., Mulders, P., Patard, J., & Sinescu, I. C. (2007) · Cited by 417
Self-citation
Cited by
Microphysiological model of renal cell carcinoma to inform anti-angiogenic therapy
Virumbrales-Muñoz, M., Ayuso, J. M., Loken, J. R., Denecke, K. M., Rehman, S., Skala, M. C., Abel, E. J., & Beebe, D. J. (2022) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121454 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Ljungberg, B., Albiges, L., Abu-Ghanem, Y., Bensalah, K., Dabestani, S., Fernández-Pello, S., Giles, R. H., Hofmann, F., Hora, M., Kuczyk, M. A., Kuusk, T., Lam, T. B., Marconi, L., Merseburger, A. S., Powles, T., Staehler, M., Tahbaz, R., Volpe, A., & Bex, A.
- Venue
- European Urology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 799-810
- ISSN
- 0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2917524635
- Cited by
- 1,456
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 157.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011
- The paper
- Ljungberg, B., Albiges, L., Abu-Ghanem, Y., Bensalah, K., Dabestani, S., Fernández-Pello, S., Giles, R. H., Hofmann, F., Hora, M., Kuczyk, M. A., Kuusk, T., Lam, T. B., Marconi, L., Merseburger, A. S., Powles, T., Staehler, M., Tahbaz, R., Volpe, A., & Bex, A. (2019). European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.