The DOI matches its Crossref record; 191 of the 191 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019
Open accessAbstract
Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but there are still many aspects of management that lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2019 addressed some of these topics to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. To present the results from the APCCC 2019. Similar to prior conferences, experts identified 10 important areas of controversy regarding the management of advanced prostate cancer: locally advanced disease, biochemical recurrence after local therapy, treating the primary tumour in the metastatic setting, metastatic hormone-sensitive/naïve prostate cancer, nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, bone health and bone metastases, molecular characterisation of tissue and blood, inter- and intrapatient heterogeneity, and adverse effects of hormonal therapy and their management. A panel of 72 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 123 predefined questions, which were developed by both voting and nonvoting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. Panellists voted based on their opinions rather than a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions had varying degrees of support by the panel, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. These voting results from a panel of prostate cancer experts can help clinicians and patients navigate controversial areas of advanced prostate management for which high-level evidence is sparse. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised based on patient-specific factors, such as disease extent and location, prior lines of therapy, comorbidities, and treatment preferences, together with current and emerging clinical evidence and logistic and economic constraints. Clinical trial enrolment for men with advanced prostate cancer should be strongly encouraged. Importantly, APCCC 2019 once again identified important questions that merit assessment in specifically designed trials. The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference provides a forum to discuss and debate current diagnostic and treatment options for patients with advanced prostate cancer. The conference, which has been held three times since 2015, aims to share the knowledge of world experts in prostate cancer management with health care providers worldwide. At the end of the conference, an expert panel discusses and votes on predefined consensus questions that target the most clinically relevant areas of advanced prostate cancer treatment. The results of the voting provide a practical guide to help clinicians discuss therapeutic options with patients as part of shared and multidisciplinary decision making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The National Comprehensive Cancer Network: Present and future directions
McGivney, W. T. (1998) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10+<2057::aid-cncr14>3.0.co;2-a · Cited by 16,766
PD-1 Blockade in Tumors with Mismatch-Repair Deficiency
Le, D. T., Uram, J. N., Wang, H., Bartlett, B. R., Kemberling, H., Eyring, A. D., Skora, A. D., Luber, B. S., Azad, N. S., Laheru, D., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1500596 · Cited by 9,377
Increased Survival with Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer after Chemotherapy
Scher, H. I., Fizazi, K., Saad, F., Taplin, M.-E., Sternberg, C. N., Miller, K., de Wit, R., Mulders, P., Chi, K. N., Shore, N. D., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1207506 · Cited by 4,586
Self-citationAbiraterone and Increased Survival in Metastatic Prostate Cancer
de Bono, J. S., Logothetis, C. J., Molina, A., Fizazi, K., North, S., Chu, L., Chi, K. N., Jones, R. J., Goodman, O. B., Saad, F., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1014618 · Cited by 4,407 · cited 1×
“When treating patients with CRPC using abiraterone, it is recommended to coadminister prednisone or prednisolone at a dose of 5 mg twice daily [91,92].”
MethodSelf-citationEnzalutamide in Metastatic Prostate Cancer before Chemotherapy
Beer, T. M., Armstrong, A. J., Rathkopf, D. E., Loriot, Y., Sternberg, C. N., Higano, C. S., Iversen, P., Bhattacharya, S., Carles, J., Chowdhury, S., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1405095 · Cited by 3,028
Self-citationChemohormonal Therapy in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Sweeney, C. J., Chen, Y.-H., Carducci, M., Liu, G., Jarrard, D. F., Eisenberger, M., Wong, Y.-N., Hahn, N., Kohli, M., Cooney, M. M., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1503747 · Cited by 2,896
Self-citationAbiraterone in Metastatic Prostate Cancer without Previous Chemotherapy
Ryan, C. J., Smith, M. R., de Bono, J. S., Molina, A., Logothetis, C. J., de Souza, P., Fizazi, K., Mainwaring, P., Piulats, J. M., Ng, S., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1209096 · Cited by 2,796
Self-citationRoach, M., Hanks, G., Thames, H., Schellhammer, P., Shipley, W. U., Sokol, G. H., & Sandler, H. (2006) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.029 · Cited by 2,749
Self-citationAR-V7 and Resistance to Enzalutamide and Abiraterone in Prostate Cancer
Antonarakis, E. S., Lu, C., Wang, H., Luber, B., Nakazawa, M., Roeser, J. C., Chen, Y., Mohammad, T. A., Chen, Y., Fedor, H. L., et al. (2014) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1315815 · Cited by 2,710
Abiraterone plus Prednisone in Metastatic, Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer
Fizazi, K., Tran, N., Fein, L., Matsubara, N., Rodriguez-Antolin, A., Alekseev, B. Y., Özgüroğlu, M., Ye, D., Feyerabend, S., Protheroe, A., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1704174 · Cited by 2,308
Self-citation
Cited by
Hofman, M. S., Emmett, L., Sandhu, S., Iravani, A., Joshua, A. M., Goh, J. C., Pattison, D. A., Tan, T. H., Kirkwood, I. D., Ng, S., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00237-3 · Cited by 1,170
Self-citationSurvival with Olaparib in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Hussain, M., Mateo, J., Fizazi, K., Saad, F., Shore, N., Sandhu, S., Chi, K. N., Sartor, O., Agarwal, N., Olmos, D., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2022485 · Cited by 792
Self-citationAbida, W., Patnaik, A., Campbell, D., Shapiro, J., Bryce, A. H., McDermott, R., Sautois, B., Vogelzang, N. J., Bambury, R. M., Voog, E., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.20.01035 · Cited by 694
Self-citationEnzalutamide and Survival in Nonmetastatic, Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Sternberg, C. N., Fizazi, K., Saad, F., Shore, N. D., De Giorgi, U., Penson, D. F., Ferreira, U., Efstathiou, E., Madziarska, K., Kolinsky, M. P., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2003892 · Cited by 428
Self-citationCommensal bacteria promote endocrine resistance in prostate cancer through androgen biosynthesis
Pernigoni, N., Zagato, E., Calcinotto, A., Troiani, M., Mestre, R. P., Calì, B., Attanasio, G., Troisi, J., Minini, M., Mosole, S., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abf8403 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gillessen, S., Attard, G., Beer, T. M., Beltran, H., Bjartell, A., Bossi, A., Briganti, A., Bristow, R. G., Chi, K. N., Clarke, N., Davis, I. D., de Bono, J., Drake, C. G., Duran, I., Eeles, R., Efstathiou, E., Evans, C. P., Fanti, S., Feng, F. Y., Fizazi, K., Frydenberg, M., Gleave, M., Halabi, S., Heidenreich, A., Heinrich, D., Higano, C. (. S., Hofman, M. S., Hussain, M., James, N., Kanesvaran, R., Kantoff, P., Khauli, R. B., Leibowitz, R., Logothetis, C., Maluf, F., Millman, R., Morgans, A. K., Morris, M. J., Mottet, N., Mrabti, H., Murphy, D. G., Murthy, V., Oh, W. K., Ost, P., O’Sullivan, J. M., Padhani, A. R., Parker, C., Poon, D. M. C., Pritchard, C. C., Reiter, R. E., Roach, M., Rubin, M., Ryan, C. J., Saad, F., Sade, J. P., Sartor, O., Scher, H. I., Shore, N., Small, E., Smith, M., Soule, H., Sternberg, C. N., Steuber, T., Suzuki, H., Sweeney, C., Sydes, M. R., Taplin, M.-E., Tombal, B., Türkeri, L., van Oort, I., Zapatero, A., & Omlin, A.
- Venue
- European Urology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 508-547
- ISSN
- 0302-2838 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3011518560
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 191
- FWCI
- 38.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.01.012
- The paper
- Gillessen, S., Attard, G., Beer, T. M., Beltran, H., Bjartell, A., Bossi, A., Briganti, A., Bristow, R. G., Chi, K. N., Clarke, N., Davis, I. D., de Bono, J., Drake, C. G., Duran, I., Eeles, R., Efstathiou, E., Evans, C. P., Fanti, S., Feng, F. Y., . . . Omlin, A. (2020). Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019. European Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.01.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.