Cited by 694PARP inhibition in cancer therapyProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchBRCA gene mutations in cancer

Rucaparib in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Gene Alteration

Open access
Abida, Wassim, Patnaik, Akash, Campbell, David, Shapiro, Jeremy, Bryce, Alan H., McDermott, Ray, Sautois, Brieuc, Vogelzang, Nicholas J. +20 more·2020·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: BRCA1 or BRCA2 ( BRCA) alterations are common in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and may confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We present results from patients with mCRPC associated with a BRCA alteration treated with rucaparib 600 mg twice daily in the phase II TRITON2 study. METHODS: We enrolled patients who progressed after one to two lines of next-generation androgen receptor–directed therapy and one taxane-based chemotherapy for mCRPC. Efficacy and safety populations included patients with a deleterious BRCA alteration who received ≥ 1 dose of rucaparib. Key efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST/Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 in patients with measurable disease as assessed by blinded, independent radiology review and by investigators) and locally assessed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥ 50% decrease from baseline) rate. RESULTS: Efficacy and safety populations included 115 patients with a BRCA alteration with or without measurable disease. Confirmed ORRs per independent radiology review and investigator assessment were 43.5% (95% CI, 31.0% to 56.7%; 27 of 62 patients) and 50.8% (95% CI, 38.1% to 63.4%; 33 of 65 patients), respectively. The confirmed PSA response rate was 54.8% (95% CI, 45.2% to 64.1%; 63 of 115 patients). ORRs were similar for patients with a germline or somatic BRCA alteration and for patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration, while a higher PSA response rate was observed in patients with a BRCA2 alteration. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was anemia (25.2%; 29 of 115 patients). CONCLUSION: Rucaparib has antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC and a deleterious BRCA alteration, but with a manageable safety profile consistent with that reported in other solid tumor types.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.20.01035

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Approval of novel therapies for mCRPC has resulted in uncertainties on optimal treatment sequencing, and utilization of these treatments is limited, demonstrating the need for improved real-world treatment practices.

    “Although improvements in clinical outcomes have been observed with novel therapies [20–31], their approval has resulted in uncertainties on optimal treatment sequencing, and utilization of these treatments is limited, demonstrating the need for improved real-world treatment practices.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. [2]Parker C Gillessen S Heidenreich A et al Cancer of the prostate: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Ann Oncol 26 v69 v77 2015 26205393
  2. [4]Gillessen S Attard G Beer TM et al Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2019 Eur Urol 77 508 547 2020 32001144
  3. [5]Abida W Armenia J Gopalan A et al Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making JCO Precis Oncol 2017 1 16 2017 PMC5558263 28825054
  4. [6]Castro E Goh C Olmos D et al Germline BRCA mutations are associated with higher risk of nodal involvement, distant metastasis, and poor survival outcomes in prostate cancer J Clin Oncol 31 1748 1757 2013 23569316 PMC3641696
  5. [7]Bancroft EK Page EC Castro E et al Targeted prostate cancer screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: Results from the initial screening round of the IMPACT study Eur Urol 66 489 499 2014 [Erratum: Eur Urol 67:e126, 2015] 24484606 PMC4105321
  6. [8]Drew Y Mulligan EA Vong WT et al Therapeutic potential of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor AG014699 in human cancers with mutated or methylated BRCA1 or BRCA2 J Natl Cancer Inst 103 334 346 2011 21183737
  7. [11]Abida W Campbell D Patnaik A et al Non-BRCA DNA damage repair gene alterations and response to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Analysis from the phase 2 TRITON2 study Clin Cancer Res 26 2487 2496 2020 32086346 PMC8435354
  8. [12]Clark TA Chung JH Kennedy M et al Analytical validation of a hybrid capture–based next-generation sequencing clinical assay for genomic profiling of cell-free circulating tumor DNA J Mol Diagn 20 686 702 2018 29936259 PMC6593250
  9. [14]Crawford B Adams SB Sittler T et al Multi-gene panel testing for hereditary cancer predisposition in unsolved high-risk breast and ovarian cancer patients Breast Cancer Res Treat 163 383 390 2017 28281021 PMC5410210
  10. [15]Neben CL Zimmer AD Stedden W et al Multi-gene panel testing of 23,179 individuals for hereditary cancer risk identifies pathogenic variant carriers missed by current genetic testing guidelines J Mol Diagn 21 646 657 2019 31201024
  11. [16]Brown EG Wood L Wood S The medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA) Drug Saf 20 109 117 1999 10082069
  12. [18]Scher HI Morris MJ Stadler WM et al Trial design and objectives for castration-resistant prostate cancer: Updated recommendations from the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 J Clin Oncol 34 1402 1418 2016 26903579 PMC4872347
  13. [20]Loriot Y Bianchini D Ileana E et al Antitumour activity of abiraterone acetate against metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel and enzalutamide (MDV3100) Ann Oncol 24 1807 1812 2013 23576708
  14. [21]Pezaro CJ Omlin AG Altavilla A et al Activity of cabazitaxel in castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel and next-generation endocrine agents Eur Urol 66 459 465 2014 24411987
  15. [22]Al Nakouzi N Le Moulec S Albigès L et al Cabazitaxel remains active in patients progressing after docetaxel followed by novel androgen receptor pathway targeted therapies Eur Urol 68 228 235 2015 24837187
  16. [23]Nuhn P De Bono JS Fizazi K et al Update on systemic prostate cancer therapies: Management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in the era of precision oncology Eur Urol 75 88 99 2019 29673712
  17. [24]Halabi S Lin C-Y Kelly WK et al Updated prognostic model for predicting overall survival in first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer J Clin Oncol 32 671 677 2014 24449231 PMC3927736
  18. [25]Mateo J Carreira S Sandhu S et al DNA-repair defects and olaparib in metastatic prostate cancer N Engl J Med 373 1697 1708 2015 26510020 PMC5228595
  19. [26]Mateo J Porta N Bianchini D et al Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial Lancet Oncol 21 162 174 2020 31806540 PMC6941219
  20. [29]de Bono J Mateo J Fizazi K et al Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer N Engl J Med 382 2091 2102 2020 32343890
  21. [31]Kristeleit R Shapiro GI Burris HA et al A phase I-II study of the oral PARP inhibitor rucaparib in patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated ovarian carcinoma or other solid tumors Clin Cancer Res 23 4095 4106 2017 28264872
  22. [32]McCormick A Swaisland H In vitro assessment of the roles of drug transporters in the disposition and drug-drug interaction potential of olaparib Xenobiotica 47 903 915 2017 27684210
  23. [33]Kikuchi R Lao Y Bow DA et al Prediction of clinical drug-drug interactions of veliparib (ABT-888) with human renal transporters (OAT1, OAT3, OCT2, MATE1, and MATE2K) J Pharm Sci 102 4426 4432 2013 24122511
  24. [35]Zibetti Dal Molin G Westin SN Msaouel P et al Discrepancy in calculated and measured glomerular filtration rates in patients treated with PARP inhibitors Int J Gynecol Cancer 30 89 93 2020 31792084
  25. [36]Tang PA Pond GR Chen EX Influence of an independent review committee on assessment of response rate and progression-free survival in phase III clinical trials Ann Oncol 21 19 26 2010 19875758

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abida, W., Patnaik, A., Campbell, D., Shapiro, J., Bryce, A. H., McDermott, R., Sautois, B., Vogelzang, N. J., Bambury, R. M., Voog, E., Zhang, J., Piulats, J. M., Ryan, C. J., Merseburger, A. S., Daugaard, G., Heidenreich, A., Fizazi, K., Higano, C. S., Krieger, L. E., Sternberg, C. N., Watkins, S. P., Despain, D., Simmons, A. D., Loehr, A., Dowson, M., Golsorkhi, T., Chowdhury, S., & on behalf of the TRITON2 investigators
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Barwon Health (AU)
  • Cabrini Hospital (AU)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Tallaght University Hospital (IE)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège (BE)
  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada (US)
  • Cork University Hospital (IE)
  • Medical Oncology, Clinique Victor Hugo Centre Jean Bernard, Le Mans, France
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • Institut Català d'Oncologia (ES)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • University Hospital Cologne (DE)
  • Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Northern Cancer Institute (AU)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Clovis Oncology (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Clovis Oncology (United States) (US)
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Abida, Wassim
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2020-11-10
Volume
38
Issue
32
Pages
3763-3772
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W3049351332
Cited by
694
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 112 · 2023: 152 · 2022: 153 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 12
FWCI
41.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (W81XWH1710124, #W81XWH-17, W81XWH, CA008748)
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation (P30 CA008748)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Pfizer
  • AstraZeneca
  • Sanofi
  • Endocyte
  • Exelixis
  • Clovis Oncology
  • Eisai
  • Astellas Pharma
  • Ipsen
  • Genentech
  • National Cancer Institute (CA092629, CA008748, P30CA008748, P50CA180995, P50CA092629)
  • Cilag
  • DOD Prostate Cancer Research Program (W81XWH-17-1-0124)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Keywords
rucaparib, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, BRCA1 mutation, BRCA2 mutation, PARP inhibitors, objective response rate, PSA response, anemia
MeSH terms
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors, Progression-Free Survival, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Humans, Indoles, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic, Germ-Line Mutation, BRCA1 Protein, BRCA2 Protein, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review