Cited by 5Global Health Workforce IssuesHealth and Medical EducationDiversity and Career in Medicine

From pipeline to practice: Utilizing tracking mechanisms for longitudinal evaluation of physician recruitment across the health workforce continuum

Taylor, Jennifer, Goletz, Sarah·2021·Evaluation and Program Planning

Abstract

PURPOSE Area Health Education Centers work with community partners to prepare a diverse, primary care workforce particularly among rural and underserved communities. We set out to assess our impact on the physician workforce across a multitude of short-term, intermediate, and long-term benchmarks METHOD: We used a comprehensive evaluation scaffolding to assess benchmarks of success across the workforce pipeline including short-term (i.e. pre-medical intent to pursue a health career or medical students' intent to practice in primary care), intermediate (college matriculation and primary care residency match rates) and longterm measures (licensure and medical practice location of program participants). RESULTS We identified significant findings in each part of the AHEC program continuum. Among our alumni, we found a significant increase in the pre-medical learner's intent to pursue a health care career. Among medical students, we found a significant increase in intent to practice in primary care, rural areas, and medically underserved communities and a high rate of primary care residency match (compared to peers). Approximately one-third of licensed physicians are now practicing medicine serve in an underserved community CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm the value of longitudinal evaluation on confirming that participation in an AHEC supported program strengthen the physician workforce development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.102014

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Taylor, J., & Goletz, S.
Affiliations
Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Jennifer
Venue
Evaluation and Program Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
89
Pages
102014
ISSN
0149-7189 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201473623
Cited by
5
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation and Program Planning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Resources and Services Administration (U77HP23068)
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
Keywords
physician workforce development, Area Health Education Centers, primary care providers, rural health workforce, medically underserved populations, longitudinal assessment
MeSH terms
Health Workforce, Humans, Medically Underserved Area, Physicians, Students, Medical, Program Evaluation, Rural Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review