Accurate judgments of intention from motion cues alone: A cross-cultural study
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ToM is present cross-culturally in contemporary populations.
“is present cross-culturally in contemporary populations (Avis and Harris 1991; Barrett et al. 2005; Cohen 2007; Cohen et al. 2011)”
From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Barrett et al. 2005
Cites
An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adaptive rationality: an evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias
Haselton, M. G., Bryant, G. A., Wilke, A., Frederick, D. A., Galperin, A., Frankenhuis, W. E., & Moore, T. (2009) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.5.733 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Sibley, C. G., & Bulbulia, J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049648 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
“Our study answers the call for ‘‘naturalistic methods’’ in the study of religion [70].”
BackgroundMiller, S. L., Maner, J. K., & Becker, D. V. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0018086 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach
Slingerland, E. (2013) · Journal of the American Academy of Religion · doi:10.1093/jaarel/lfs094 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Infants’ perception of chasing
Frankenhuis, W. E., House, B., Clark Barrett, H., & Johnson, S. P. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.10.001 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Inferring the intentional states of autonomous virtual agents
Pantelis, P. C., Baker, C. L., Cholewiak, S. A., Sanik, K., Weinstein, A., Wu, C.-C., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Feldman, J. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.011 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barrett, H. C., Todd, P. M., Miller, G. F., & Blythe, P. W.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barrett, H. Clark
- Venue
- Evolution and Human Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 313-331
- ISSN
- 1090-5138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154269506
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 9.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evolution and Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- intention inference, motion cues, whole-body movement, social cognition, cross-cultural comparison, Shuar, children's social cognition, intentional action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
