Cited by 12Nutrition and Health in AgingFrailty in Older AdultsUltrasound Imaging and Elastography

Usefulness of muscle echo intensity for evaluating functional performance in the older population: A scoping review

Open access
Kitagawa, Takashi, Nakamura, Masatoshi, Fukumoto, Yoshihiro·2023·Experimental Gerontology

Abstract

Muscle echo intensity, as measured by ultrasonography, could be used as a new marker of functional performance in older populations. This scoping review aimed to present evidence on the utility of muscle echo intensity as determined by ultrasonography for assessing functional performance in older adults. The eligibility criterion included observational studies that investigated the associations between muscle echo intensity and functional performance in older adults. Terms, such as "echo intensity" and "older adults", were searched for in databases, such as PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane database of systematic reviews, and the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, in April 2021. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted the data; 46 papers, of which almost one-third were Japanese, were subsequently identified for inclusion. The representative functional performances included in this review were muscle strength, gait speed, sit-to-stand test results, and timed up-and-go test results. Poor to moderate associations were found between muscle echo intensity and functional performance; however, heterogeneities were observed in the characteristics of study participants. Moreover, the accurate effect size and causal inferences between muscle echo intensity and functional performance remained unclear. Further longitudinal studies are needed to determine these causal inferences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.exger.2023.112301

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kitagawa, T., Nakamura, M., & Fukumoto, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shinshu University (JP)
  • Nishikyushu University (JP)
  • Kansai Medical University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kitagawa, Takashi
Venue
Experimental Gerontology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
182
Pages
112301
ISSN
0531-5565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387207720
Cited by
12
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Experimental Gerontology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP 21K17470)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Keywords
muscle echo intensity, muscle ultrasound, functional performance, older adults, muscle strength, walking speed, sit-to-stand test, Timed Up and Go test, sarcopenia
MeSH terms
Walking Speed, Physical Functional Performance, Aged, Aging, Humans, Ultrasonography, Geriatric Assessment, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review