Cited by 76

Smad3 null mice display more rapid wound closure and reduced scar formation after a stab wound to the cerebral cortex.

Wang, Yu, Moges, Helina, Bharucha, Yasmin, Symes, Aviva·2007·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Following central nervous system injury, adult mammalian neurons do not regenerate through regions of scar formation. This regenerative failure is due in part to the inhibitory environment of the glial scar at the lesion site. Following injury, transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) is strongly induced and is important to many aspects of the response to injury, including deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) in the glial scar. However, the pathways through which TGF-beta signals to mediate these effects are not known. In order to examine the contribution of the TGF-beta-induced transcription factor, Smad3, to formation of the glial scar after traumatic brain injury, we utilized mice that do not express Smad3. We report that Smad3 null mice heal stab wounds to the cerebral cortex more rapidly than do wild-type mice. In Smad3 null mice many aspects of glial scar formation and the immune response to injury were altered. Fewer neutrophils, macrophages/microglia, NG2-positive cells and GFAP-positive cells were detected immediately around the lesion in Smad3 null mice. Expression of fibronectin and laminin was also reduced. Injury-induced cell proliferation was significantly lower in Smad3 null mice around the lesion. There was no overall difference between wild-type and Smad3 null mice in immunoreactivity for TGF-beta(1) after injury. Thus, our experiments suggest that TGF-beta signaling through Smad3 contributes significantly to the immune response and scar formation after…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.08.006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SMAD3 knock-out mice exhibit alterations in many aspects of glial function, including altered scar formation and immune response to injury, with fewer neutrophils, macrophages/microglia, NG2-positive cells and GFAP-positive cells around lesions.

    “SMAD3 knock-out mice exhibit alterations in many aspects of glial function, including altered scar formation and immune response to injury [51]. Fewer neutrophils, macrophages/microglia, NG2-positive cells and GFAP-positive cells were reported around lesions in Smad3 null mice brains.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Moges, H., Bharucha, Y., & Symes, A.
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-01
Volume
203
Issue
1
Pages
168-184
ISSN
0014-4886
Cited by
76
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review