The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Management of nerve gaps: Autografts, allografts, nerve transfers, and end-to-side neurorrhaphy
Open accessAbstract
Since its introduction in the late 1870’s, surgical restoration of function following peripheral nerve injury has made significant progress (Naff and Ecklund, 2001). The development of the operating microscope, improved microsurgical techniques, and a greater understanding of the internal topography of perpheral nerves has greatly improved functional outcomes. In addition, advances in basic science and clinical research have furthered our understanding of the pathophysiology of nerve injury, recovery, and repair. There are several factors that influence recovery following a nerve injury: time elapsed, patient age, mechanism, proximity of the lesion to distal targets, and associated soft tissue or vascular injuries (Gilbert, et al., 2006, Hentz and Narakas, 1988, Slutsky, 2006). All these factors must be carefully considered in order to optimize the operative approach used in each unique patient. Prompt repair of nerve injuries leads to improved outcomes by allowing for earlier distal motor end plate and sensory receptor reinnervation. In younger patients, the more robust regenerative capacity typically results in better outcomes compared to the elderly. Mechanism of damage is an important determinant of the longitudinal extent of the injury. More proximal lesions must traverse longer distances to reinnervate the distal target. And finally, concomitant soft tissue or vascular injuries can result in significant distortion and scarring, seriously complicating exploration of the affected area. The ultimate goal of any peripheral nerve reconstruction is the restoration of function as promptly and completely as possible, while minimizing donor site and systemic morbidity. In cases where a tension-free primary end-to-end neurorrhaphy is not possible, several alternatives exist. This review summarizes these options for repair including interpositional nerve grafting, transfers and end-to-side neurorrhaphy (Fig. 1). Open in a separate window Figure 1 Summarizes the various options for nerve repair. Nerve allografts are utilized for large, otherwise irreparable injuries. Nerve transfer use redundant nerve fibers for a proximal nerve injury. The autograft is used to reconstruct a nerve gap. Direct repair is used when there is no intervening nerve gap to create tension. Both end-to-side and nerve conduits are used for noncritical sensory injuries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vijayavenkataraman, S. (2020) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.003 · Cited by 556
Pfister, B. J., Gordon, T., Loverde, J. R., Kochar, A. S., Mackinnon, S. E., & Cullen, D. K. (2011) · Critical Reviews™ in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v39.i2.20 · Cited by 358
Self-citationHussain, G., Wang, J., Rasul, A., Anwar, H., Qasim, M., Zafar, S., Aziz, N., Razzaq, A., Hussain, R., de Aguilar, J.-L. G., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijbs.35653 · Cited by 323
3D printed anatomical nerve regeneration pathways
Johnson, B. N., Lancaster, K. Z., Zhen, G., He, J., Gupta, M. K., Kong, Y. L., Engel, E. A., Krick, K. D., Ju, A., Meng, F., et al. (2015) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201501760 · Cited by 293
Ma, Y., Wang, H., Wang, Q., Cao, X., & Gao, H. (2023) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.139424 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Ray, W. Z., & Mackinnon, S. E.
- Venue
- Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-05
- Volume
- 223
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-85
- ISSN
- 0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2080468808
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of nerve gaps: Autografts, allografts, nerve transfers, and end-to-side neurorrhaphy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.031
- The paper
- Ray, W. Z., & Mackinnon, S. E. (2010). Management of nerve gaps: Autografts, allografts, nerve transfers, and end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Experimental Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.