Cited by 293Nerve injury and regeneration3D Printing in Biomedical ResearchElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

3D printed anatomical nerve regeneration pathways

Open access
Johnson, Blake N., Lancaster, Karen Z., Zhen, Gehua, He, Junyun, Gupta, Maneesh K., Kong, Yong Lin, Engel, Esteban A., Krick, Kellin D. +5 more·2015·Advanced Functional Materials

Abstract

A 3D printing methodology for the design, optimization, and fabrication of a custom nerve repair technology for the regeneration of complex peripheral nerve injuries containing bifurcating sensory and motor nerve pathways is introduced. The custom scaffolds are deterministically fabricated via a microextrusion printing principle using 3D models, which are reverse engineered from patient anatomies by 3D scanning. The bifurcating pathways are augmented with 3D printed biomimetic physical cues (microgrooves) and path‐specific biochemical cues (spatially controlled multicomponent gradients). In vitro studies reveal that 3D printed physical and biochemical cues provide axonal guidance and chemotractant/chemokinetic functionality. In vivo studies examining the regeneration of bifurcated injuries across a 10 mm complex nerve gap in rats showed that the 3D printed scaffolds achieved successful regeneration of complex nerve injuries, resulting in enhanced functional return of the regenerated nerve. This approach suggests the potential of 3D printing toward advancing tissue regeneration in terms of: (1) the customization of scaffold geometries to match inherent tissue anatomies; (2) the integration of biomanufacturing approaches with computational modeling for design, analysis, and optimization; and (3) the enhancement of device properties with spatially controlled physical and biochemical functionalities, all enabled by the same 3D printing process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/adfm.201501760

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nerves can be scanned and reconstructed in three dimensions in order to later 3D print cuffs perfectly adapted to their anatomy.

    “Nerves can be scanned in reconstructed in three dimensions in order to later 3D print cuffs perfectly adapted to their anatomy (Johnson et al., 2015), potentially minimizing mechanical trauma and FBR at the nerve-implant interface.”

    From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Johnson et al., 2015

    Section 3 describes scanning a nerve, reconstructing its 3D geometry, and printing a geometrically matching nerve-regeneration pathway. It does not describe printing nerve cuffs; the device in this paper is a nerve guide for repairing a gap, so the claim changes the type of device. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [41]Rusinkiewicz S Hall-Holt O Levoy M ACM Trans Graphics 2002 21 438
  2. [49]Licari JJ Swanson DW Materials and Processes for Electronic Applications Elsevier 2011 126

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, B. N., Lancaster, K. Z., Zhen, G., He, J., Gupta, M. K., Kong, Y. L., Engel, E. A., Krick, K. D., Ju, A., Meng, F., Enquist, L. W., Jia, X., & McAlpine, M. C.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
  • Jia, Xiaofeng
  • McAlpine, Michael C.
Venue
Advanced Functional Materials
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-09-18
Volume
25
Issue
39
Pages
6205-6217
ISSN
  • 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-3028
OpenAlex
W1768356346
Cited by
293
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
13.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advanced Functional Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (NSF) Materials Research Science and Engineering Centers (MRSEC) Program (DMR-0819860)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01NS033506, R01NS060699, R01HL118084)
  • Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund (2013-MSCRFE-146-00)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
peripheral nerve regeneration, microgrooves, axon guidance, chemotaxis, nerve repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review