Cited by 64Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsPluripotent Stem Cells Research

iPS-derived neural progenitor cells from PPMS patients reveal defect in myelin injury response

Nicaise, Alexandra M., Banda, Erin, Guzzo, Rosa M., Russomanno, Kristen, Castro-Borrero, Wanda, Willis, Cory M., Johnson, Kasey M., Lo, Albert C. +1 more·2017·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) currently lacking any effective treatment. Promoting endogenous brain repair offers a potential strategy to halt and possibly restore neurologic function in PPMS. To understand how the microenvironment within white matter lesions plays a role in repair we have focused on neural progenitor cells (NPCs) since these are found in lesions in PPMS and have been found to influence oligodendrocyte progenitor cell maturation (OPCs). To better understand the cellular nature of NPCs in PPMS we developed iPS cells from blood samples of PPMS patients and age matched non-disease spouse or blood relative controls. Using these iPS cell lines we determined that the NPCs from PPMS cases provided no neuroprotection against active CNS demyelination compared to NPCs from control iPS lines which were capable of completely preventing injury. Conditioned media (CM) from PPMS NPCs provides no protection to OPCs and prevents maturation of OPCs into oligodendrocytes in vitro. We also found that CM from PPMS iPS NPCs elicited patient-specific differences in the response to compounds that should foster oligodendrocyte (OL) maturation. Together, these data establish a new model for understanding the nature of myelination defects in PPMS which may lead to novel targeted approaches for preventing demyelination in these patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.11.012

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicaise, A. M., Banda, E., Guzzo, R. M., Russomanno, K., Castro-Borrero, W., Willis, C. M., Johnson, K. M., Lo, A. C., & Crocker, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Crocker, Stephen J.
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-02
Volume
288
Pages
114-121
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2550973557
Cited by
64
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Keywords
primary progressive multiple sclerosis, induced pluripotent stem cells, neural progenitor cells, demyelination, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, oligodendrocyte maturation, remyelination, neuroprotection, conditioned medium, white matter lesions
MeSH terms
Aged, Animals, Axons, Cell Differentiation, Clemastine, Cuprizone, Myelin Basic Protein, Female, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Miconazole, Middle Aged, Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors, Myelin Sheath, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Oligodendroglia, Culture Media, Conditioned, Apoptosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review