Cuprizone-Dependent De/Remyelination Responses and Functional Correlates in Mouse Strains Adopted to Model Relapsing, Chronic and Progressive Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis
Open accessAbstract
NOD mice represent a unique strain that recapitulates some aspects of progressive MS when subjected to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). It is unknown, however, whether a proneness to demyelination and/or defect in remyelination contribute to disease progression in NOD mice. Answering to this question might help deciphering the molecular and cellular events underpinning disease evolution in progressive MS. Here, we compared the cuprizone-dependent demyelination and remyelination responses, as well as their functional correlates, in NOD, C57BL/6, and SJL mice typically adopted to model progressive, chronic or relapsing EAE. We report that demyelination occurred to a similar extent in the three mice strains, and that in none of them there was evidence of axonal degeneration during prolonged demyelination. Moreover, immunostaining for GFAP + astrocytes, Iba1 + microglia, and NG2 + oligodendrocyte precursor cells similarly increased in the 3 mouse strains after cuprizone exposure. The mice underwent concomitant and complete remyelination 2 weeks after cuprizone withdrawal. On a functional level, NOD mice showed the earliest reduction of spontaneous motility and full recovery, but no impairment of motor skill. Conversely, C57BL/6 animals showed phasic reduction of both spontaneous motility and motor skill. Lastly, SJL mice presented the most severe neurological impairment with long-lasting reduction of spontaneous motility and motor skill. Overall, data suggest that the unique feature of EAE progression in NOD mice is not due to proneness to demyelination or intrinsic defects in myelin formation. Findings also unravel important functional differences in the response of the three mouse stains to cuprizone that can be harnessed to design and interpret future experiments.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In female NOD, C57BL/6, and SJL mice, 6-week cuprizone caused similar callosal demyelination, glial/OPC activation, and complete remyelination 2 weeks after withdrawal, with no axonal degeneration. Despite similar pathology, strains differed functionally: NOD had earliest spontaneous motility loss and no motor-skill deficit, C57BL/6 had phasic motor-skill loss after withdrawal, and SJL had the most severe and long-lasting deficits.
Key findings
- Six weeks of 0.4% cuprizone produced massive corpus callosum demyelination that did not differ among NOD, C57BL/6, and SJL mice; Bielschowsky staining showed no evidence of abnormal neurofilament staining, and myelin completely recovered in all three strains 2 weeks after cuprizone withdrawal.
- Immunostaining for GFAP+ astrocytes, Iba1+ microglia, and NG2+ oligodendrocyte precursor cells increased after cuprizone exposure with no difference among strains (n = 4 per strain, 3 sections per animal).
- Spontaneous motility declined in all strains, but NOD mice showed reduction at day 10 versus day 30 for C57BL/6 and SJL; NOD and C57BL/6 recovered 10 days after withdrawal, whereas SJL recovered only at day 70. Motor skill was unaffected in NOD, transiently reduced in C57BL/6 at days 10 and 20 after withdrawal, and most severely impaired in SJL during cuprizone treatment.
- NOD glycemia measured weekly from week 12 never exceeded control values (< 250 mg/dL), arguing against diabetes as the cause of motor impairment.
Methods
- Five-week-old female NOD/ShiLtj, SJL, and C57BL/6 mice were fed 0.4% cuprizone for 6 weeks, then standard chow; total cuprizone-exposed mice were 20 per strain. Histology used 10 mice per strain (5 at 6 weeks, 5 at 2 weeks after withdrawal), behavior used 10 mice per strain, and immunohistochemistry used 4 mice per strain.
- Corpus callosum was assessed by Luxol Fast Blue for myelin and Bielschowsky silver staining for axons; GFAP, Iba1, and NG2 immunofluorescence was quantified with ImageJ by a blinded operator.
- Spontaneous motility was measured by board test every 10 days; motor skill was measured by rota rod at 30 RPM with a 300 s cutoff. Statistics used ANOVA plus Tukey’s or Dunnett’s tests, or Kruskal–Wallis plus Dunn’s post test, with alpha 0.05.
Limitations
- The paper states that cuprizone-dependent demyelination is massive and acute, so the data do not rule out a subtle remyelination defect in NOD mice under a less acute but more prolonged autoimmune demyelination such as EAE.
- The authors state they do not have an explanation for the apparent inconsistency in NOD mice, namely earlier reduction of spontaneous motility despite complete maintenance of motor skill.
- Evident from the text: only female mice were studied; the study uses cuprizone rather than direct EAE comparison; histological analysis focuses on corpus callosum; and functional assessment is limited to board test and rota rod.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
11 of 19 cited sources checked · 6 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
NOD mice represent a unique strain that recapitulates some aspects of progressive MS when subjected to EAE.
“NOD mice represent a unique strain that recapitulates some aspects of progressive MS when subjected to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE).”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
“we recently characterized the EAE NOD mouse model and provided neurological, neuropathological, and immune evidence that it recapitulates key features of PMS (Buonvicino et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Buonvicino et al. 2019 source
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
- Premisecitation
SJL mice are differently affected by cuprizone compared to C57BL/6 mice.
“Data are also in keeping with prior work showing that SJL mice are differently affected by cuprizone compared to those of the C57BL/6 strain (Taylor et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Taylor et al. 2009 source
- Premisecitation
The neuropathological correlate of EAE NOD progression consists in widespread spinal cord demyelination invariably accompanied by axonal loss heralded by impairment of mitochondrial structure and function.
“the neuropathological correlate consists in widespread spinal cord demyelination that is invariably accompanied by axonal loss heralded by impairment of mitochondrial structure and function.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Buonvicino et al. 2019 source
- Premisecitation
Progression of EAE in NOD mice can be counteracted by the bioenergetic-boosting drug dexpramipexole.
“it can be counteracted by the bioenergetic-boosting drug dexpramipexole (Buonvicino et al. 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Buonvicino et al. 2020 source
- Premisecitation
Reduction of cytotoxic CD8+ lymphocytes by dexamethasone does not provide protection from disease progression in EAE NOD mice.
“reduction of this neuroimmune response by dexamethasone does not provide protection from disease progression (Buonvicino et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Buonvicino et al. 2019 source
Section 3.6 reports that dexamethasone did not reduce disease progression in PPEAE NOD mice despite reducing neuroinflammation. It specifically reports a significant reduction in spinal-cord CD4+ lymphocytes, but does not establish a reduction in CD8+ lymphocytes; that cell-specific part of the claim is unsupported by the results passage. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Progression of EAE in NOD mice is insensitive to immune suppression.
“whereas progression of EAE in NOD mice is insensitive to immune suppression (Buonvicino et al. 2019)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Buonvicino et al. 2019 source
Section 3.6 reports that dexamethasone did not reduce EAE progression in NOD mice, even with prolonged treatment, despite reducing measures of immune activity. The study tested this corticosteroid under specified treatment schedules; it does not establish that progression is insensitive to immune suppression generally. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The increase in GFAP+ astrocytes, Iba1+ microglia, and NG2+ OPCs immunostaining after cuprizone did not differ among the three mouse strains.
“showing however no difference among the strains (Fig. 2).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“Even the extent of astrocyte, microglia and OPC activation in the demyelinated area does not differ among the stains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Findingown data
Six weeks of a cuprizone diet caused massive demyelination in the corpus callosum of NOD, C57BL/6, and SJL mice.
“We found that 6 weeks of a cuprizone diet (Fig. 1a) prompted massive demyelination in the corpus callosum of NOD, C57BL/6, and SJL mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Six weeks of cuprizone diet increased immunostaining for GFAP+ astrocytes, Iba1+ microglia, and NG2+ OPCs in the corpus callosum of NOD, C57BL/6, and SJL mice.
“We found that 6 weeks after the cuprizone diet immunostaining for GFAP+ astrocytes, Iba1+ microglia as well as NG2+ OPCs dramatically increased in the corpus callosum of the mice”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“immunostaining for GFAP+ astrocytes, Iba1+ microglia, and NG2+ oligodendrocyte precursor cells similarly increased in the 3 mouse strains after cuprizone exposure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
The reductions in spontaneous motility during cuprizone exposure were of the same extent in all three mouse strains.
“All the three mouse strains underwent reductions of motility of the same extent (Fig. 3a–c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Two weeks after cuprizone withdrawal, demyelination completely recovered in NOD, C57BL/6, and SJL mice.
“We found that demyelination completely recovered in NOD, C57BL/6, and SJL mice (Fig. 1f and g).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“The mice underwent concomitant and complete remyelination 2 weeks after cuprizone withdrawal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
All three mouse strains showed a time-dependent reduction in spontaneous motility during cuprizone exposure.
“As far as spontaneous motility is concerned, we found that all of the three mouse strains showed a time-dependent reduction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The extent of cuprizone-induced demyelination did not differ among NOD, C57BL/6, and SJL mice.
“Notably, as revealed by stain densitometry, the extent of demyelination did not differ among the three mouse strains (Fig. 1b and c).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“We report that demyelination occurred to a similar extent in the three mice strains”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“We show here that callosal demyelination occurs to a similar extent in the three mouse strains”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
Full recovery of spontaneous motility occurred 10 days after cuprizone withdrawal in both NOD and C57BL/6 mice.
“Full recovery of spontaneous motility occurred 10 days after cuprizone withdrawal in both NOD and C57BL/6 mice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
SJL mice showed severe impairment of motor skill that began during cuprizone treatment and slowly recovered to control levels.
“SJL mice showed a much more severe impairment of motor skill that began during cuprizone treatment and slowly recovered to control levels (Fig. 3f).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“SJL mice presented the most severe neurological impairment with long-lasting reduction of spontaneous motility and motor skill.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
Motor skill was not affected in NOD mice throughout the entire course of the experiments.
“the rota road test demonstrated that motor skill was not affected in NOD mice throughout the entire course of the experiments (Fig. 3d).”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“no impairment of motor skill.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
SJL mice showed delayed recovery of spontaneous motility, reaching control values only at day 70 after cuprizone withdrawal.
“Conversely, SJL mice showed a much more delayed recovery of motility that reached control values only at day 70 (Fig. 3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Glycaemia in NOD mice measured weekly from week 12 never exceeded control values (<250 mg/dL).
“we measured glycaemia in these animals a weekly basis from week 12 and found that it never exceeded control values (< 250 mg/dL).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The earlier reduction of spontaneous motility in NOD mice is in contrast with their complete maintenance of motor skill.
“the earlier reduction of spontaneous motility in NOD mice is in contrast with their complete maintenance of motor skill.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A defect in myelination signaling has been detected in PMS patients.
“Accordingly, a defect in myelination signaling has been detected in PMS patients (Lassmann et al. 2012; Nicaise et al. 2017, 2019).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lassmann et al. 2012 source
- cites Nicaise et al. 2017, 2019
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
Efficient remyelination in SJL mice is in good agreement with their ability to recover from EAE relapses.
“indicate efficient remyelination in SJL mice in good agreement with their ability to recover from EAE relapses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The ability of SJL mice to fully recover motor functions after EAE relapses tends to rule out a defect in this strain of OPC proliferation and remyelination.
“the ability of SJL mice to fully recover motor functions after the several relapses that typically characterize their EAE course tends to rule out a defect in this mouse strain of OPC proliferation and remyelination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The ability of NOD mice to undergo massive callosal demyelination and complete remyelination upon cuprizone withdrawal suggests efficient OPC proliferation.
“Remarkably, the ability of NOD mice to undergo massive callosal demyelination and complete remyelination upon interruption of exposure to the toxicant suggests efficient OPC proliferation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The data do not allow ruling out that a subtle defect in the remyelination response may occur in NOD mice when exposed to a less acute but more prolonged autoimmune demyelination such as EAE.
“Still, considering that cuprizone-dependent demyelination is massive and acute, we reason that our data do not allow to rule out that a subtle defect in the remyelination response may occur in NOD mice when they are exposed to a less acute, but more prolonged, autoimmune demyelination such as that taking place during EAE.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
An intrinsic sensitivity to the demyelinated state is not responsible for axonal degeneration and progression in EAE NOD mice.
“This finding, therefore, provides the first evidence that an intrinsic sensitivity to the demyelinated state is not responsible for axonal degeneration and progression in EAE NOD mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
EAE progression in NOD mice should not be ascribed to defects of the remyelination response.
“This finding, along with evidence that the extent of the demyelination/remyelination response in NOD mice does not differ with that in SJL animals, that typically undergo 1–3 relapses during EAE but never progress (Cavone et al. 2011, 2014), suggest that EAE progression in NOD animals should not be ascribed to defects of the remyelination response.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“findings rule out that intrinsic defects of the remyelinating response are causative in determining the progressive nature of EAE in NOD mice”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cavone et al. 2011, 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
- Premisecitation
Mice with genetic defects or lesions in the corpus callosum do not show an overt motor impairment.
“mice with genetic defects or lesions in the corpus callosum do not show an overt motor impairment (Schalomon and Wahlsten 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schalomon and Wahlsten 2002 source
- Interpretationreasoning
A key role in determining the peculiar response of NOD mice during EAE is played by their tendency to undergo neurodegeneration upon inflammation-driven chronic demyelination.
“Apparently, therefore, a key role in determining the peculiar response of NOD mice during EAE is also played by their tendency to undergo neurodegeneration upon inflammation-driven chronic demyelination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These findings strengthen the reliability of EAE in NOD mice as a model of PMS.
“on the other strengthen the reliability of EAE in NOD mice as a model of PMS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 11
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 4
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationActivation of innate immunity within demyelinated regions during cuprizone treatment lasts about 1 month, which is shorter than the 2-4 months necessary for progression onset in NOD animals.
“It is worth noting, indeed, that activation of innate immunity within demyelinated regions during cuprizone treatment (Fig. 2 and (Skripuletz et al. 2013)) lasts for an extent of time of about 1 month that is shorter than that of 2–4 months necessary for progression onset in NOD animals (Buonvicino et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites Skripuletz et al. 2013 source
- cites Buonvicino et al. 2019 source
The citation is attached to the claim that progression in NOD mice takes 2–4 months to begin. Section 3.1 instead reports disease onset around day 20 after immunization in the 10-week-old mice used for the study and describes their disability as gradually worsening from onset. It reports 12–122 days to reach score 4 *after* onset, not a 2–4-month wait for progression to begin; the cuprizone duration is attributed to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCuprizone-dependent demyelination is massive within the corpus callosum but also occurs within additional brain regions such as the cortex and hippocampus.
“cuprizone-dependent demyelination is massive within the corpus callosum but also occurs within additional brain regions such as the cortex and hippocampus (Koutsoudaki et al. 2009; Skripuletz et al. 2008; Steelman et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Koutsoudaki et al. 2009 source
- cites Skripuletz et al. 2008 source
The section “De-and Remyelination in the Cortex Are Similar to Changes in the Corpus Callosum” reports severe demyelination in the corpus callosum and complete demyelination in the cortex after cuprizone treatment. Our copy does not report hippocampal demyelination, so it does not support that part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Steelman et al. 2012 source
The Results report prominent demyelination in the cerebral cortex, and the Discussion reports nearly complete demyelination in caudal regions of the corpus callosum. But the paper says rostral callosal regions are less affected, so it does not support massive demyelination throughout the corpus callosum. It examines the dorsal hippocampal commissure, not demyelination of the hippocampus itself (Results; Discussion; page numbers unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationHistological sections were analyzed by a blinded operator.
“sections were analyzed by a blinded operator by using ImageJ software (Buonvicino et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Buonvicino et al. 2019 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationExposure to a cuprizone-containing diet is a prototypical model of demyelination probably due to copper-chelating effects in oligodendrocytes.
“Exposure to a cuprizone-containing diet is a prototypical model of demyelination probably due to the copper-chelating effects of the compound in oligodendrocytes (Vega-Riquer et al. 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Vega-Riquer et al. 2019 source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataC57BL/6 mice showed unaffected motor skill during cuprizone treatment but a delayed and phasic motor skill reduction at day 10 and 20 after cuprizone withdrawal.
“C57BL/6 mice also showed unaffected motor skill during cuprizone treatment but, oddly, underwent a delayed and phasic motor skill reduction at day 10 and 20 after cuprizone withdrawal (Fig. 3e).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenRecovery of motor skill in SJL mice was more rapid than that of spontaneous motility but showed the highest degree of reduction.
“Recovery of motor skill in SJL mice was more rapid than that of spontaneous motility but showed the highest degree of reduction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNOD mice showed reduced spontaneous motility at day 10 after cuprizone exposure, whereas C57BL/6 and SJL mice showed reduction at day 30.
“NOD mice showed reduced motility at day 10 after cuprizone exposure, whereas C57BL/6 and SJL mice showed a reduction in spontaneous motility at day 30.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThere was no evidence of axonal degeneration or abnormal neurofilament staining during prolonged demyelination in NOD, C57BL/6, and SJL mice.
“we found no evidence of abnormal neurofilament staining even in those regions undergoing complete demyelination.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“in none of them there was evidence of axonal degeneration during prolonged demyelination.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“none of the mouse strains showed sign of neurodegeneration during demyelination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPeculiarities of the autoimmune attack during EAE and/or primary proneness to axonopathy in NOD mice are implicated in the cause of disease progression.
“Rather, the present study, along with data showing an impairment of the T regulatory response in NOD mice (Tang et al. 2008), point to peculiarities of the autoimmune attack during EAE and/or primary proneness to axonopathy in this mouse strain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tang et al. 2008 source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNeither proneness to demyelination nor impaired remyelination processes underpin disease progression in EAE NOD mice.
“As a whole, data suggest that neither proneness to demyelination nor impaired remyelination processes underpin disease progression in EAE NOD mice.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“the unique feature of EAE progression in NOD mice is not due to proneness to demyelination or intrinsic defects in myelin formation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn EAE NOD mice, disease slowly but inexorably progresses to severe neurological impairment that always leads to death without signs of disease stabilization, at variance with RR-EAE in SJL or chronic EAE in C57BL/6.
“in EAE NOD mice slowly but inexorably progresses to a severe neurological impairment that always leads to death without signs of disease stabilization (Buonvicino et al. 2019, 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Buonvicino et al. 2019, 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenA prompt remyelination response typically follows cuprizone withdrawal and is sustained by OPC proliferation.
“A prompt remyelination response typically follows cuprizone withdrawal and is sustained by olygodendrocyte precursor cell proliferation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll animal care and experimental procedures were performed according to European Community guidelines and were approved by the Committee for Animal Care and Experimental Use of the University of Florence.
“All animal care and experimental procedures were performed according to the European Community guidelines for animal care (European Communities Council Directive 2010/63/EU) and were approved by the Committee for Animal Care and Experimental Use of the University of Florence.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The authors state this as an assumption.
It is unknown whether a proneness to demyelination and/or defect in remyelination contribute to disease progression in NOD mice.
“It is unknown, however, whether a proneness to demyelination and/or defect in remyelination contribute to disease progression in NOD mice.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The neuropathological basis of disease progression in EAE NOD mice and why other mouse strains do not show the same feature of disease evolution are still unknown.
“In spite of these achievements, however, the neuropathological basis of disease progression in EAE NOD mice as well as why other mouse strains do not show the same feature of disease evolution are still unknown.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
If animals are provided standard chow after acute cuprizone-induced demyelination, endogenous remyelination occurs, which is on the histological level complete after 3-4 weeks.
“If the animals are provided standard chow after acute cuprizone-induced demyelination, endogenous remyelination occurs, which is on the histological level complete after 3–4 weeks [25].”
From How to Use the Cuprizone Model to Study De- and Remyelination (2024) · cites this paper as [25]
The Experimental Procedures say mice were returned to standard chow after cuprizone feeding. The Results report complete recovery of callosal demyelination when assessed two weeks after withdrawal, but do not establish the claimed 3–4-week timeframe. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Figure 3 panel b is assigned to two different outcomes
MinorThe Results identify panels a-c as spontaneous motility, which makes panel b a motility panel. The Figure 3 caption instead identifies panel b as motor skill.
“All the three mouse strains underwent reductions of motility of the same extent (Fig. 3a–c).”
“Effects of cuprizone and its withdrawal on spontaneous locomotion a and motor skill b in NOD, C57BL/6, and SJL mice.”
Cites
Ocrelizumab versus Placebo in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis
Montalban, X., Hauser, S. L., Kappos, L., Arnold, D. L., Bar-Or, A., Comi, G., de Seze, J., Giovannoni, G., Hartung, H.-P., Hemmer, B., et al. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1606468 · Cited by 1,905 · see citing works
Thompson, A. J., Baranzini, S. E., Geurts, J. J. G., Hemmer, B., & Ciccarelli, O. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30481-1 · Cited by 1,856 · see citing works
Progressive multiple sclerosis: pathology and pathogenesis
Lassmann, H., van Horssen, J., & Mahad, D. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2012.168 · Cited by 1,033 · see citing works
Kappos, L., Bar-Or, A., Cree, B. A. C., Fox, R. J., Giovannoni, G., Gold, R., Vermersch, P., Arnold, D. L., Arnould, S., Scherz, T., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30475-6 · Cited by 942 · see citing works
Central Role of Defective Interleukin-2 Production in the Triggering of Islet Autoimmune Destruction
Tang, Q., Adams, J. Y., Penaranda, C., Melli, K., Piaggio, E., Sgouroudis, E., Piccirillo, C. A., Salomon, B. L., & Bluestone, J. A. (2008) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.016 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
Virtual hypoxia and chronic necrosis of demyelinated axons in multiple sclerosis
Trapp, B. D., & Stys, P. K. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70043-2 · Cited by 621 · see citing works
The quantitative measurement of motor inco-ordination in naive mice using an accelerating rotarod
Jones, B. J., & Roberts, D. J. (1968) · Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.2042-7158.1968.tb09743.x · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Multiple sclerosis: experimental models and reality
Lassmann, H., & Bradl, M. (2017) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-016-1631-4 · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Skripuletz, T., Hackstette, D., Bauer, K., Gudi, V., Pul, R., Voss, E., Berger, K., Kipp, M., Baumgärtner, W., & Stangel, M. (2013) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws262 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
Pathology of multiple sclerosis and related inflammatory demyelinating diseases
Kutzelnigg, A., & Lassmann, H. (2014) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-52001-2.00002-9 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Cortical Demyelination Is Prominent in the Murine Cuprizone Model and Is Strain-Dependent
Skripuletz, T., Lindner, M., Kotsiari, A., Garde, N., Fokuhl, J., Linsmeier, F., Trebst, C., & Stangel, M. (2008) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.2353/ajpath.2008.070850 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Nicaise, A. M., Wagstaff, L. J., Willis, C. M., Paisie, C. A., Chandok, H., Robson, P., Fossati, V., Williams, A., & Crocker, S. J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1818348116 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
Five Decades of Cuprizone, an Updated Model to Replicate Demyelinating Diseases
Vega-Riquer, J. M., Mendez-Victoriano, G., Morales-Luckie, R. A., & Gonzalez-Perez, O. (2019) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x15666170717120343 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Steelman, A. J., Thompson, J. P., & Li, J. (2012) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2011.10.002 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Animal models of multiple sclerosis: Focus on experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
Bjelobaba, I. M., Begović-Kuprešanin, V., Peković, S., & Lavrnja, I. C. (2018) · Journal of Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1002/jnr.24224 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Early highly effective versus escalation treatment approaches in relapsing multiple sclerosis
Ontaneda, D., Tallantyre, E. C., Kalinčík, T., Planchon, S. M., & Evangelou, N. (2019) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30151-6 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
EAE: imperfect but useful models of multiple sclerosis
Hart, B. A. ‘., Gran, B., & Weissert, R. (2011) · Trends in Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2010.11.006 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Demyelination of the hippocampus is prominent in the cuprizone model
Koutsoudaki, P. N., Skripuletz, T., Gudi, V., Moharregh-Khiabani, D., Hildebrandt, H., Trebst, C., & Stangel, M. (2009) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2008.11.058 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Taylor, L. C., Gilmore, W., & Matsushima, G. K. (2009) · Brain Pathology · doi:10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00230.x · Cited by 84 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Data are also in keeping with prior work showing that SJL mice are differently affected by cuprizone compared to those of the C57BL/6 strain (Taylor et al. 2009).”
ResultiPS-derived neural progenitor cells from PPMS patients reveal defect in myelin injury response
Nicaise, A. M., Banda, E., Guzzo, R. M., Russomanno, K., Castro-Borrero, W., Willis, C. M., Johnson, K. M., Lo, A. C., & Crocker, S. J. (2017) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.11.012 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Advances in our understanding of the pathophysiology of Type 1 diabetes: lessons from the NOD mouse
Jayasimhan, A., Mansour, K. P., & Slattery, R. M. (2013) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs20120627 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Cavone, L., Aldinucci, A., Ballerini, C., Biagioli, T., Moroni, F., & Chiarugi, A. (2011) · Multiple Sclerosis Journal · doi:10.1177/1352458511399113 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationExperimental Models of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Current Concepts and Perspective
Skundric, D. S. (2005) · Current Neurovascular Research · doi:10.2174/156720205774322601 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Schalomon, P. M., & Wahlsten, D. (2002) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/s0361-9230(01)00633-5 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Buonvicino, D., Ranieri, G., Pratesi, S., Guasti, D., & Chiarugi, A. (2019) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113065 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationBuonvicino, D., Ranieri, G., Pratesi, S., Gerace, E., Muzzi, M., Guasti, D., Tofani, L., & Chiarugi, A. (2020) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.15058 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationLong‐term suppression of EAE relapses by pharmacological impairment of epitope spreading
Cavone, L., Peruzzi, B., Caporale, R., & Chiarugi, A. (2013) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.12525 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How to Use the Cuprizone Model to Study De- and Remyelination
Kipp, M. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25031445 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“…acute demyelination), paralleled Instead, it has been proposed that a reactive cuprizone–copper complex is responsible for the toxic effects of cuprizone and that various cell types within the CNS are affected [19–21]. extensive microglial and astrocytic proliferation and damage to axons [22–25].”
BackgroundSiponimod supports remyelination in the non-supportive environment
Krüger, J., Behrangi, N., Schliep, D., Heinig, L., Vankriekelsvenne, E., Wigger, N., & Kipp, M. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-87825-8 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Landzhov, B. V., Gaydarski, L., Stanchev, S., Kostadinova, I., Iliev, A. A., Kotov, G. N., Rashev, P., Mourdjeva, M., Pupaki, D. V., & Stamenov, N. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms252313011 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Pistolesi, A., Cesaris, F. D., Buonvicino, D., et al. (2025) · Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2025.105456 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationAlam, M. Z., Bagabir, H. A., Zaher, M. A. F., Alqurashi, T. M. A., Alghamdi, B. S. A., Kazi, M., El-Aziz, G. S. A., Alshahrany, G. A., Alzahrani, N. A., Bakhalgi, R. M., et al. (2025) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph18101478 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ranieri, G., Chiarugi, A., & Buonvicino, D. (2025) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2025.578809
Self-citationSpatial Dynamics of Cuprizone-Induced Myelin Loss and Recovery in the Mouse Corpus Callosum
Gaydarski, L., Petrova, K., Georgiev, G. P., & Kostadinova, I. (2026) · Acta Medica Bulgarica · doi:10.2478/amb-2026-0007
Protective effects of adenosine A2B receptor antagonism in a cuprizone-induced demyelination model
Cherchi, F., Venturini, M., Frulloni, L., Panozzi, F., Magni, G., Santalmasi, C., Maestrelli, C., Giovannini, M. G., Coppi, E., Lana, D., et al. (2026) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2026.110944
- Authors
- Buonvicino, D., Ranieri, G., & Chiarugi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Florence (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Buonvicino, Daniela
- Venue
- Neurotoxicity Research
- Published
- 2021-01-21
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 658-666
- ISSN
- 1029-8428 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-3524
- PMC
- PMC8096768
- OpenAlex
- W3126017551
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neurotoxicity Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (2014/R/6)
- Università degli Studi di Firenze
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- cuprizone, demyelination, remyelination, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, multiple sclerosis, NOD mice, C57BL/6 mice, SJL mice, mouse strain differences, astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocyte precursor cells, axonal degeneration, motor function, spontaneous motility, disease progression
- MeSH terms
- Remyelination, Animals, Chelating Agents, Chronic Disease, Cuprizone, Demyelinating Diseases, Disease Models, Animal, Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental, Female, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Myelin Sheath, Mice, Inbred NOD, Disease Progression, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-13.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-13.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review