The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Magnitude and farm-economic value of grain legume pre-crop benefits in Europe: A review
Open accessAbstract
Grain legume production offers multiple environmental benefits and can enhance sustainability of European farming, but their production area is declining constantly. Grain legume competitiveness is frequently constrained by lower gross margins compared to agronomically suitable cropping alternatives, but it can be improved by appreciating their ability to increase yield of subsequent crop(s) and, potentially, to reduce input requirements (fertiliser, biocide, tillage). Information on the magnitude of grain legume pre-crop effects is diverse and has not been synthesised for European agriculture. This paper reviews research on pre-crop benefits to yield and input requirements of subsequent crops, and the farm-economic profitability of grain legumes in European cropping systems. This includes an analysis of the magnitude of pre-crop benefits to cereal yields measured in 29 experiments in Europe; and 19 studies on grain legume gross margins ranging from crop to cropping system level are assessed. In the available studies, yield benefits of legumes to subsequent crops are highest under low nitrogen fertilisation to subsequent crops and fertilisation can be reduced by 60 kg N ha−1 on average under maintenance of acceptable yields. With the aim at maximising yield potential, nitrogen fertilisation following grain legumes can be reduced by 23–31 kg ha−1, and cereal yields are mostly 0.5–1.6 Mg ha−1 higher than after cereal pre-crops. With adequate estimates of pre-crop benefits, gross margins of full crop rotations can better assess grain legume competitiveness. In the studies reviewed, 35 of 53 modelled crop rotations with grain legumes were competitive with comparable non-legume rotations. Grain legume rotations were more competitive under conservation tillage systems if gross margin calculations accounted for cost savings arising from adjusted machinery requirements. In conclusion, grain legume pre-crop value is a crucial component of their farm-economic profitability in European cropping systems, but further experimental research is required to ascertain its magnitude. Expanding profitability measures to consider pre-crop effects substantially increases the number of situations where grain legumes can compete with cereals, and has a small positive effect on their competitiveness with alternative break crops. Besides a better consideration of the pre-crop value, further genetic and agronomic improvement in legume cropping, supportive market development, and policy support are required if Europe is to utilise environmental benefits of legumes and increase the sustainability of its farming.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 1×
“The ‘break crop effect’ includes benefits to soil organic matter and structure (e.g. Leithold et al., 1997; West and Post, 2002; Wu et al., 2003; Hernanz et al., 2009), phosphorus mobilisation (Egle et al., 2003; Shen et al., 2011), and reduced pressure from diseases and weeds (e.g. Robson et al.,…”
BackgroundPhosphorus Dynamics: From Soil to Plant
Shen, J., Yuan, L., Zhang, J., Li, H., Bai, Z., Chen, X., Zhang, W., & Zhang, F. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.175232 · Cited by 1,858
The contributions of nitrogen-fixing crop legumes to the productivity of agricultural systems
Peoples, M. B., Brockwell, J., Herridge, D. F., Rochester, I. J., Alves, B. J. R., Urquiaga, S., Boddey, R. M., Dakora, F. D., Bhattarai, S., Maskey, S. L., et al. (2009) · Symbiosis · doi:10.1007/bf03179980 · Cited by 901
Jensen, E. S., Peoples, M. B., Boddey, R. M., Gresshoff, P. M., Hauggaard-Nielsen, H., J.R. Alves, B., & Morrison, M. J. (2012) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-011-0056-7 · Cited by 779
Annual intercrops: an alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture.
Lithourgidis, A., Dordas, C. A., Damalas, C. A., & Vlachostergios, D. Ν. (2011) · Australian Journal of Crop Science · Cited by 778
Why are wheat yields stagnating in Europe? A comprehensive data analysis for France
Brisson, N., Gate, P., Gouache, D., Charmet, G., Oury, F.-X., & Huard, F. (2010) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.012 · Cited by 767
Jensen, E. S., Peoples, M. B., & Hauggaard-Nielsen, H. (2010) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2009.10.008 · Cited by 573
Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production
Kirkegaard, J., Christen, O., Krupinsky, J., & Layzell, D. (2008) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2008.02.010 · Cited by 506
Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models
Janssen, S., & van Ittersum, M. K. (2007) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2007.03.001 · Cited by 456
Cited by
Ecological-economic trade-offs of Diversified Farming Systems – A review
Rosa-Schleich, J., Loos, J., Mußhoff, O., & Tscharntke, T. (2019) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.002 · Cited by 397
Grain Legume Production and Use in European Agricultural Systems
Watson, C. A., Reckling, M., Preissel, S., Bachinger, J., Bergkvist, G., Kuhlman, T., Lindström, K., Nemecek, T., Topp, C. F. E., Vanhatalo, A., et al. (2017) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2017.03.003 · Cited by 328
Self-citationDoes crop rotation yield more in China? A meta-analysis
Zhao, J., Yang, Y., Zhang, K., Jeong, J., Zeng, Z., & Zang, H. (2020) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107659 · Cited by 267
Sadras, V. O., Hayman, P. T., Rodriguez, D., Monjardino, M., Bielich, M., Unkovich, M., Mudge, B., & Wang, E. (2016) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp16027 · Cited by 142
van der Pol, L. K., Robertson, A., Schipanski, M., Calderon, F. J., Wallenstein, M. D., & Cotrufo, M. F. (2022) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2022.107906 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Preissel, S., Reckling, M., Schläfke, N., & Zander, P.
- Venue
- Field Crops Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 175
- Pages
- 64-79
- ISSN
- 0378-4290 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150725272
- Cited by
- 339
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 35.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnitude and farm-economic value of grain legume pre-crop benefits in Europe: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.01.012
- The paper
- Preissel, S., Reckling, M., Schläfke, N., & Zander, P. (2015). Magnitude and farm-economic value of grain legume pre-crop benefits in Europe: A review. Field Crops Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2015.01.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.