Cited by 65Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

Addressing the soil carbon dilemma: Legumes in intensified rotations regenerate soil carbon while maintaining yields in semi-arid dryland wheat farms

Open access
van der Pol, Laura K., Robertson, Andy, Schipanski, Meagan, Calderon, Francisco J., Wallenstein, Matthew D., Cotrufo, M. Francesca·2022·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

Semi-arid regions support the majority of global wheat production, but they are threatened by continued soil erosion and increased risk of drought and extreme temperatures from climate change. Enhancing soil organic matter (SOM) is a key adaptation strategy for sustaining agriculture in these regions because it can improve water retention and nutrient cycling. When seeking to increase SOM, growers face a dilemma, known as the ‘soil carbon (C) dilemma’ (Janzen, 2006): How can SOM be increased, while also increasing the release of nutrients that accompanies decomposition? Our observational study examined whether growers could address this dilemma through intensification with diverse grain crops. We specifically tested whether incorporating legumes into a continuous rotation influences the form and amount of SOM as well as productivity in farms of the central Great Plains region of the U.S. by contrasting three, no-till rotation systems: 1) conventional wheat-fallow; 2) continuous grain-only rotations, and 3) continuous grain rotations that incorporate a legume crop. We sampled on-farm fields and experimental agricultural research station plots that had received one of these rotations for at least eight years. We compared yield, soil organic C (SOC), and nitrogen (N) stocks in bulk soil to 1 m, as well as SOC and N in particulate organic matter (POM) and mineral-associated organic matter (MAOM) in surface soils (0–10 cm) among the different rotations. We also estimated the long-term effects of the rotations on SOC fractions through a simulation of each rotation with the MEMS 1.0 model, verified with measured data. We found that intensifying the rotation with continuous grains led to 1.5-fold increase in aggregate size but did not change SOC stocks. Incorporating a legume to the continuous grain rotation resulted in 1 Mg C ha-1 more SOC on average in surface soil compared to wheat-fallow rotations. No significant soil changes among rotations were observed at depth. Longer-term simulations of these cropping systems suggest that including legumes could allow for 10% greater SOC gains over time compared to wheat-fallow. Since legume incorporation also increased crop yields across the full rotation cycle, our results support our hypothesis that growers can solve the ‘soil C dilemma’ by simultaneously increasing the quantity and N-content of soil input through continuous cropping with both grains and legumes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107906

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Van der Pol et al. (2022) found that converting a fallow-grain crop rotation to a continuous grain crop rotation increased grain yield and SOC stocks only when a legume crop was also included in the rotation.

    “This was affirmed by another recent study (van der Pol et al., 2022), who found that converting a fallow-­ grain crop rotation to a continuous grain crop rotation increased grain yield and SOC stocks only when a legume crop was also included in the rotation (enhancing inputs from biological N 2 fixation).”

    From Carbon for soils, not soils for carbon (2023) · cites this paper as van der Pol et al., 2022

    The Abstract reports that continuous grains without legumes did not change SOC stocks, while adding a legume increased surface-soil SOC relative to wheat–fallow. But section 4.2 says annualized crop yields increased under both continuous rotations, so the claim that yield increased only with a legume is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 113 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., 2002. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: a Practical Information-Theoretic Approach, 2nd ed. Springer, New York. https://doi. org/10.1007/B97636. · DOI
  2. Conant, R.T., Smith, G.R., Paustian, K., 2003. Spatial variability of soil carbon in forested and cultivated sites. J. Environ. Qual. 32, 278-286. https://doi.org/10.2134/ jeq2003.0278. · DOI
  3. Fox, J., Weisberg, S., 2011. An {R} Companion to Applied Regression, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 〈http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Co mpanion〉.
  4. Meena, R.S., Das, A., Singh, G., Lal, R., 2018. Legumes for Soil Health and Sustainable Management. Springer Nature, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13- 0253-4. · DOI
  5. Sirisha, L., Naresh, R.K., Mrunalini, K., Mahajan, N.C., Jat, L., 2019. Tillage and residue management practices on soil carbon, nitrogen mineralization dynamics and changes in soil microbial community under RWCS: a review. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 7, 4974-4994.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Pol, L. K., Robertson, A., Schipanski, M., Calderon, F. J., Wallenstein, M. D., & Cotrufo, M. F.
Affiliations
  • Shell (United States) (US)
  • Colorado State University (US)
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
330
Pages
107906
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4211118823
Cited by
65
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 2
FWCI
7.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Keywords
Fabaceae, crop rotation, soil organic matter, wheat-fallow rotation, nitrogen stocks, particulate organic matter, mineral-associated organic matter, soil aggregate size, crop yield, no-tillage, Great Plains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review