Cited by 124Genetically Modified Organisms ResearchAgricultural safety and regulationsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Results of a 13 week safety assurance study with rats fed grain from glyphosate tolerant corn

Hammond, B, Dudek, R, Lemen, J, Nemeth, M·2004·Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

The current study presents the results of a 13 week feeding study in rats with grain from Roundup Ready corn which is tolerant to the herbicide glyphosate. Herbicide tolerance was accomplished through the introduction of cp4 epsps coding sequences into the corn genome for in planta production of CP4 EPSPS enzymes. Unlike related corn EPSPS enzymes, CP4 EPSPS enzymes are not inhibited by the herbicide glyphosate. Purina TestDiets formulated Roundup Ready corn grain into rodent diets at levels of 11 and 33% (w/w). The responses of rats fed diets containing Roundup Ready corn grain were compared to that of rats fed diets containing non-transgenic grain (controls). All diets were nutritionally balanced and conformed to Purina Mills, Inc. specifications for Certified LabDiet 5002. There were 400 rats in the study divided into 10 groups of 20 rats/sex/group. Overall health, body weight, food consumption, clinical pathology parameters (hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis), organ weights, gross and microscopic appearance of tissues were comparable between groups fed diets containing Roundup Ready and control corn grain. This study complements extensive agronomic, compositional and farm animal feeding studies with Roundup Ready corn grain, confirming it is as safe and nutritious as existing commercial corn hybrids.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fct.2004.02.013

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. OECD, 1997. Report of The Workshop on the Toxicological and Nutritional Testing of Novel Foods. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) SG/ICGB(98)1.
  2. 2001, Decision on Monsanto request (00-011-01p): Extension of determination of nonregulated status for glyphosate herbicide tolerant corn lines nk 603, Environmental Assessment. Federal Register, 65, 52693

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–123 of 123

Metadata

Authors
Hammond, B., Dudek, R., Lemen, J., & Nemeth, M.
Corresponding author
Hammond, B
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-06
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
1003-1014
ISSN
0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158306630
Cited by
124
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Keywords
glyphosate tolerance, CP4 EPSPS, herbicide-tolerant crops, safety assurance, long-term dietary exposure, rats, clinical pathology, organ weight, histopathology, food safety
MeSH terms
Glyphosate, Animals, Animal Feed, Body Weight, Zea mays, Drug Tolerance, Female, Glycine, Hematologic Tests, Hematology, Herbicides, Male, Safety, Urinalysis, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Plants, Genetically Modified, Food, Genetically Modified, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review