Genotoxicity studies on fucoidan from Sporophyll of Undaria pinnatifida
Abstract
The sulfated seaweed extract, fucoidan, has anticoagulant, antithrombotic, and antiviral activities. Despite extensive work on the biological activities of fucoidan, detailed studies on the genotoxicity of fucoidan from Sporophyll of Undaria pinnatifida sources have not been tested before. The objective of this study was to investigate the genotoxicity effects of fucoidan extracted from Sporophyll of U. pinnatifida using a test battery of three different methods. In a reverse mutation assay using four Salmonella typhimurium strains and Escherichia coli, fucoidan did not increase the number of revertant colonies in any tester strain regardless of metabolic activation by S9 mix, and did not cause chromosomal aberration in short tests with S9 mix or in the continuous (24 h) test. A bone marrow micronucleus test in ICR mice dosed by oral gavage at doses up to 2000 mg/kg bw/day showed no significant or dose-dependent increases in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE), and the high dose suppressed the ratio of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) to total erythrocytes. We conclude that fucoidan presents no significant genotoxic concern under the anticipated conditions of use.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fucoidans have attracted attention as practically nontoxic natural products with antitumor, immunomodulatory, and other useful properties.
“This research is necessary for the solution of problems of standardization of preparations on the basis of fucoidans, which have attracted attention as practically nontoxic natural products [25,26,27] with antitumor, immunomodulatory, and other useful properties [24,28,29,30].”
From Anticancer and Cancer Preventive Properties of Marine Polysaccharides: Some Results and Prospects (2013) · cites this paper as [26]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 55
- Authors
- Kim, K.-J., Lee, O.-H., & Lee, B.-Y.
- Affiliations
- CHA University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Lee, Boo-Yong
- Venue
- Food and Chemical Toxicology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1101-1104
- ISSN
- 0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983908412
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
- Keywords
- fucoidan, Undaria pinnatifida, sporophylls, genotoxicity, chromosomal abnormalities, bone marrow micronucleus test, polychromatic erythrocytes, Salmonella typhimurium, Escherichia coli, ICR mice, food safety
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anticoagulants, Biotransformation, Bone Marrow Cells, Cricetulus, Erythrocytes, Escherichia coli, Cricetinae, Male, Mice, Inbred ICR, Mutagens, Plant Extracts, Polysaccharides, Salmonella typhimurium, Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms, Micronucleus Tests, CHO Cells, Plant Leaves, Undaria, Micronuclei, Chromosome-Defective, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review