Cited by 39Arsenic contamination and mitigationHeavy Metals in PlantsEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Survey of arsenic content in edible seaweeds and their health risk assessment

Open access
Yu, Yanli, Morales-Rodriguez, Alba, Zhou, Guangming, Barrón, Dolores, Sahuquillo, Àngels, López-Sánchez, José Fermín·2024·Food and Chemical Toxicology

Abstract

Since humans are especially sensitive to arsenic exposure, predominantly through diet, a strict control of the most widely consumed seaweeds is mandatory. Total arsenic contents and arsenic species in twenty-five different seaweeds from five different origins were studied. Seaweeds selected, included Phaeophyta (brown seaweed), Chlorophyta (green seaweed) and Rhodophyta (red seaweed) genera. The highest arsenic content appears in the Phaeophyta seaweed in the range from 11 to 162 mg kg−1 dried weight. Arsenosugars were found to be the predominant species of arsenic in most seaweeds, being up to 99.7% of total arsenic in some samples. The arsenic dietary intakes for seaweeds studied were assessed and the Target Hazard Quotients (THQ) and the Target Cancer Risk (TCR) were calculated, taking into account inorganic arsenic contents (iAs). iAs species in seaweeds showed low risk of arsenic intake except for Hizikia fusiforme samples.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fct.2024.114603

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Laminaria ochroleuca exhibited average As concentrations of 76.8 mg/kg in China, 52.5 mg/kg in Korea, and 41.1 mg/kg in Spain.

    “On a broader scale, Laminaria ochroleuca exhibited average As concentrations of 76.8 mg/kg in China, 52.5 mg/kg in Korea, and 41.1 mg/kg in Spain [227], demonstrating how regional ecological conditions and species traits magnify disparities in heavy metal levels.”
  • Variations in heavy metal levels complicate risk assessment and highlight the need for precaution in consumption, particularly when algae are consumed frequently or in concentrated forms such as supplements.

    “These variations complicate risk assessment and highlight the need for precaution in consumption, particularly when algae are consumed frequently or in concentrated forms such as supplements [227].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yu, Y., Morales-Rodriguez, A., Zhou, G., Barrón, D., Sahuquillo, À., & López-Sánchez, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Yangtze Normal University (CN)
  • Southwest University (CN)
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
Food and Chemical Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
187
Pages
114603
ISSN
0278-6915 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392878454
Cited by
39
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food and Chemical Toxicology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Chongqing Municipal Education Commission (KJQN202301418, KJQN202201438)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Heavy Metals in Plants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
arsenic, seaweed, dietary arsenic intake, arsenic speciation, arsenosugars, inorganic arsenic, health risk assessment, target hazard quotient, target cancer risk, brown algae, green seaweed, red seaweed, Hizikia fusiformis, food safety
MeSH terms
Edible Seaweeds, Phaeophyceae, Arsenic, Arsenicals, Humans, Seaweed, Vegetables, Risk Assessment, Sargassum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review