Methods for the isolation and identification of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes: a review
Abstract
Listeria monocytogenes is an important food-borne pathogen and is widely tested for in food, environmental and clinical samples. Identification traditionally involved culture methods based on selective enrichment and plating followed by the characterization of Listeria spp. based on colony morphology, sugar fermentation and haemolytic properties. These methods are the gold standard; but they are lengthy and may not be suitable for testing of foods with short shelf lives. As a result more rapid tests were developed based on antibodies (ELISA) or molecular techniques (PCR or DNA hybridization). While these tests possess equal sensitivity, they are rapid and allow testing to be completed within 48 h. More recently, molecular methods were developed that target RNA rather than DNA, such as RT-PCR, real time PCR or nucleic acid based sequence amplification (NASBA). These tests not only provide a measure of cell viability but they can also be used for quantitative analysis. In addition, a variety of tests are available for sub-species characterization, which are particularly useful in epidemiological investigations. Early typing methods differentiated isolates based on phenotypic markers, such as multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, phage typing and serotyping. These phenotypic typing methods are being replaced by molecular tests, which reflect genetic relationships between isolates and are more accurate. These new methods are currently mainly used in research but their considerable potential for routine testing in the future cannot be overlooked.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The traditional method for qualitative and quantitative detection of pathogenic microorganisms in algae food requires pre-enrichment, selective enrichment, isolation and culture, biochemical identification, and typing.
“Currently, the traditional method requires the qualitative and quantitative detection of pathogenic microorganisms in algae food through various stages of processing, such as pre-enrichment, selective enrichment, isolation and culture, biochemical identification, and typing [118,119]”
From Current Status and Future Trends in Removal, Control, and Mitigation of Algae Food Safety Risks for Human Consumption (2022) · cites this paper as [118]
The traditional method for pathogenic microorganism detection has limitations such as cumbersome and time-consuming operation.
“but this method has limitations, such as cumbersome and time-consuming operation.”
From Current Status and Future Trends in Removal, Control, and Mitigation of Algae Food Safety Risks for Human Consumption (2022) · cites this paper as [118]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 290 · Cited by 410
- Authors
- Gasanov, U., Hughes, D., & Hansbro, P. M.
- Affiliations
- Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hansbro, Philip M.
- ORCID
- Hansbro, Philip M.
- Venue
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 851-875
- ISSN
- 0168-6445 (ISSN-L)
- 1574-6976
- OpenAlex
- W2117457191
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 290
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- FEMS Microbiology Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Hunter Medical Research Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
- Keywords
- Listeria monocytogenes, Listeria spp., bacterial isolation, bacterial identification, foodborne pathogens, rapid detection, RT-PCR, NASBA, molecular typing, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, phage typing, serotyping, food safety testing
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteriological Techniques, Environmental Microbiology, Food Microbiology, Humans, Listeria, Listeriosis, Listeria monocytogenes, Bacterial Typing Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review