Preterm birth, ovarian endometriomata, and assisted reproduction technologies
Open accessAbstract
Objective To report preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA) rates from assisted reproduction technologies (ART) patients with ovarian endometriomata compared with control groups.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting Tertiary university affiliated ART center and Perinatal Data Collection Unit (PDCU).Patient(s) Every woman who had an ART singleton baby born between 1991 and 2004 had her database record assessed (N = 4382). Control groups included 1201 singleton babies from ART patients without endometriosis and 2400 randomly selected women from the PDCU database of 850,000 births.Intervention(s) There were 95 singleton ART babies from patients with ovarian endometriomata and 535 ART singleton babies from patients who had endometriosis but no ovarian endometriomata.Main outcome measure(s) Preterm birth rates and SGA birth rates.Result(s) Preterm birth rate increased only in the ovarian endometriomata group when compared with community birth records (n = 850,000). Furthermore, ART patients with ovarian endometriomata had a statistically significantly increased likelihood of having a SGA baby when compared with other forms of endometriosis.Conclusion(s) Rates of preterm birth and SGA babies doubled in infertility patients with ovarian endometriomata who required ART.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Retrospective studies have suggested that women with endometriosis may have higher rates of maternal complications and fetal problems such as preeclampsia and miscarriage, though these associations need further study.
“Retrospective studies have suggested that women with endometriosis may have higher rates of maternal complications and fetal problems such as preeclampsia and miscarriage (46–50), though these associations need further study.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 150
- Authors
- Fernando, S., Breheny, S., Jaques, A. M., Halliday, J. L., Baker, G., & Healy, D.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- Epworth Hospital (AU)
- Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Healy, David
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 325-330
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2125104158
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 8.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- preterm birth, small for gestational age, endometrioma, endometriosis, assisted reproduction, infertility, singleton pregnancy, perinatal outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Birth Rate, Endometriosis, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Infertility, Female, Ovarian Diseases, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Risk Assessment, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Premature Birth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review