Cited by 150Endometriosis Research and TreatmentAssisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Health and Technologies

Preterm birth, ovarian endometriomata, and assisted reproduction technologies

Open access
Fernando, Shavi, Breheny, Sue, Jaques, Alice M., Halliday, Jane L., Baker, Gordon, Healy, David·2009·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To report preterm birth and small for gestational age (SGA) rates from assisted reproduction technologies (ART) patients with ovarian endometriomata compared with control groups.Design Retrospective cohort study.Setting Tertiary university affiliated ART center and Perinatal Data Collection Unit (PDCU).Patient(s) Every woman who had an ART singleton baby born between 1991 and 2004 had her database record assessed (N = 4382). Control groups included 1201 singleton babies from ART patients without endometriosis and 2400 randomly selected women from the PDCU database of 850,000 births.Intervention(s) There were 95 singleton ART babies from patients with ovarian endometriomata and 535 ART singleton babies from patients who had endometriosis but no ovarian endometriomata.Main outcome measure(s) Preterm birth rates and SGA birth rates.Result(s) Preterm birth rate increased only in the ovarian endometriomata group when compared with community birth records (n = 850,000). Furthermore, ART patients with ovarian endometriomata had a statistically significantly increased likelihood of having a SGA baby when compared with other forms of endometriosis.Conclusion(s) Rates of preterm birth and SGA babies doubled in infertility patients with ovarian endometriomata who required ART.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.096

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 150

Authors
Fernando, S., Breheny, S., Jaques, A. M., Halliday, J. L., Baker, G., & Healy, D.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Epworth Hospital (AU)
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Healy, David
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
325-330
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125104158
Cited by
150
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
preterm birth, small for gestational age, endometrioma, endometriosis, assisted reproduction, infertility, singleton pregnancy, perinatal outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Rate, Endometriosis, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Infertility, Female, Ovarian Diseases, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies, Risk Assessment, Reproductive Techniques, Assisted, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review