Cited by 236Endometriosis Research and TreatmentEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and ManagementMenstrual Health and Disorders

World Endometriosis Research Foundation Endometriosis Phenome and biobanking harmonization project: II. Clinical and covariate phenotype data collection in endometriosis research

Open access
Vitonis, Allison F., Vincent, Katy, Rahmioglu, Nilufer, Fassbender, Amelie, Buck Louis, Germaine M., Hummelshoj, Lone, Giudice, Linda C., Stratton, Pamela +58 more·2014·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To harmonize the collection of nonsurgical clinical and epidemiologic data relevant to endometriosis research, allowing large-scale collaboration. DESIGN: An international collaboration involving 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators from 16 countries on five continents. SETTING: In 2013, two workshops followed by global consultation, bringing together 54 leaders in endometriosis research. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTION(S): Development of a self-administered endometriosis patient questionnaire (EPQ), based on [1] systematic comparison of questionnaires from eight centers that collect data from endometriosis cases (and controls/comparison women) on a medium to large scale (publication on >100 cases); [2] literature evidence; and [3] several global consultation rounds. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Standard recommended and minimum required questionnaires to capture detailed clinical and covariate data. RESULT(S): The standard recommended (EPHect EPQ-S) and minimum required (EPHect EPQ-M) questionnaires contain questions on pelvic pain, subfertility and menstrual/reproductive history, hormone/medication use, medical history, and personal information. CONCLUSION(S): The EPQ captures the basic set of patient characteristics and exposures considered by the WERF EPHect Working Group to be most critical for the advancement of endometriosis research, but is also relevant to other female conditions with similar risk factors and/or symptomatology. The instruments will be reviewed based on feedback from investigators, and-after a first review after 1 year-triannually through systematic follow-up surveys. Updated versions will be made available through http://endometriosisfoundation.org/ephect.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The WERF EPHect Working Group developed standard recommended (EPQ-S) and minimum required (EPQ-M) self-administered questionnaires to harmonize nonsurgical clinical and epidemiologic data collection in endometriosis research. The instruments cover pain, subfertility/reproductive history, menstrual and hormone history, medical/surgical history, medication use, and personal/lifestyle information, with planned periodic review.

Key findings

  • The standard recommended (EPHect EPQ-S) and minimum required (EPHect EPQ-M) questionnaires contain questions on pelvic pain, subfertility and menstrual/reproductive history, hormone/medication use, medical history, and personal information.
  • Development involved 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators (54 participants) from 16 countries on five continents, and was based on questionnaires from eight centers that had published on >100 cases.
  • Pilot work in several EPHect centers showed the full standard questionnaire requires 25 to 40 minutes to complete in paper or electronic form; the EPQ-M excludes life-course sections considered secondary in some settings.
  • Pain intensity is measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale; the EPQ includes the SF-MPQ, recommends SF-MPQ-2 as standard, and includes the 13-question Pain Catastrophizing Scale; menstrual flow is classified using a validated menstrual pictogram.

Methods

  • International consensus process: two workshops in March 2013 and July 2013, followed by global consultation, bringing together 54 leaders in endometriosis research; 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators from 16 countries participated.
  • Questionnaire development used systematic comparison of questionnaires from eight centers, a PubMed literature search, expert review of question phrasing and temporality, patient/volunteer piloting, face-validity review, and consensus at Workshop II.
  • No patients were included; ethics committee or IRB approval was not required for formation of the Working Group, literature review, or consensus on best practices, and the endeavor did not include human subjects data.

Limitations

  • Stated: the EPQ is not designed for clinical practice to inform immediate clinical decisions, nor for in-clinic completion and immediate review.
  • Stated: the Working Group excluded potentially important exposures such as nevi and freckles, sun exposure, and in utero exposures, and did not include validated generic health status or depression/anxiety scales because some require registration and/or payment; self-administered questionnaires are also not appropriate for accurately collecting detailed infertility treatment data.
  • Evident from the text: no formal psychometric validation of the full EPQ is reported; validation relies on previously validated component questions, piloting, and face-validity review.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.1244

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 76 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Pilot work in several EPHect centers has shown that in both paper and electronic form the full standard questionnaire requires 25 to 40 minutes to complete.

    “However, we stress that pilot work in several EPHect centers has shown that in both paper and electronic form the full standard questionnaire requires 25 to 40 minutes to complete.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    WERF EPHect provides standard operating procedures for the collection, processing, and long-term storage of biologic samples from women with and without endometriosis.

    “and [2] standard operating procedures (SOPs) for the collection, processing, and long-term storage of biologic samples from women with and without endometriosis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    A complete history of hormone use is captured in the EPHect EPQ.

    “A complete history of hormone use is captured in the questionnaire”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the EPHect EPQ, participants are asked if they have ever been diagnosed (and at what age) with a list of ~30 medical conditions, including cancer, gynecologic diseases, pain syndromes, and autoimmune diseases.

    “In the EPHect EPQ, participants are asked if they have ever been diagnosed (and at what age) with a list of ~30 medical conditions, including cancer, gynecologic diseases, pain syndromes, and autoimmune diseases”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Premisecitation

    Successful, field-altering risk-factor and subphenotype investigations among many centers have been demonstrated by large consortia across an array of health outcomes.

    “Indeed, successful, field-altering risk-factor and subphenotype investigations among many centers have been demonstrated by large consortia across an array of health outcomes (5–11).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 7 sources checked
    • cites [5] Blein, 2014, Factors associated with oxidative stress and cancer risk in the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium, Free Radic Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] Elks, 2013, Age at menarche and type 2 diabetes risk: the EPIC-InterAct study, Diabetes Care source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] Felix, 2013, The etiology of uterine sarcomas: a pooled analysis of the epidemiology of endometrial cancer consortium, Br J Cancer source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] Thorgeirsson, 2013, A common biological basis of obesity and nicotine addiction, Transl Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] Trabert, 2014, Aspirin, nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and acetaminophen use and risk of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer: a pooled analysis in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, J Natl Cancer Inst source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] Jung, 2013, Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of breast cancer by hormone receptor status, J Natl Cancer Inst source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11] Pesch, 2013, N-acetyltransferase 2 phenotype, occupation, and bladder cancer risk: results from the EPIC cohort, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 55
  • May combine two claims. 23
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The sections excluded from the minimum version focus on symptoms or characteristics pertaining across the life course.

    “These sections focus on symptoms or characteristics pertaining across the life course.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The WERF EPHect global initiative has involved 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators (54 participants) from 16 countries on five continents.

    “To date, the WERF EPHect global initiative has involved 34 clinical/academic centers and three industry collaborators (54 participants) from 16 countries on five continents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    EPHect agreed on two tiers for all data collection instruments as well as for biologic sample SOPs: standard recommended and minimum required.

    “EPHect therefore agreed on two tiers for all data collection instruments as well as for biologic sample SOPs: standard recommended and minimum required.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    The standard recommended (EPHect EPQ-S) and minimum required (EPHect EPQ-M) questionnaires contain questions on pelvic pain, subfertility and menstrual/reproductive history, hormone/medication use, medical history, and personal information.

    “The standard recommended (EPHect EPQ-S) and minimum required (EPHect EPQ-M) questionnaires contain questions on pelvic pain, subfertility and menstrual/reproductive history, hormone/medication use, medical history, and personal information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    The EPQ captures the basic set of patient characteristics and exposures considered by the WERF EPHect Working Group to be most critical for the advancement of endometriosis research.

    “The EPQ captures the basic set of patient characteristics and exposures considered by the WERF EPHect Working Group to be most critical for the advancement of endometriosis research”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    WERF EPHect provides evidence-based guidelines on detailed surgical, clinical, and epidemiologic phenotyping data to be collected from women with and without endometriosis to allow collaborative subphenotype discovery and validation analyses.

    “WERF EPHect provides evidence-based guidelines on [1] detailed surgical, clinical, and epidemiologic phenotyping (phenome) data to be collected from women with and without endometriosis to allow collaborative subphenotype discovery and validation analyses”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingcitation

    The EPHect Working Group agreed that pain intensity will be measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale anchored with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain.

    “Using these guidelines, the EPHect Working Group agreed that pain intensity will be measured on an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) anchored with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Pain affect is captured on the EPHect EPQ with the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ).

    “Pain affect is captured on the EPHect EPQ with the short form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The standard definition of infertility can be derived from data collected with the EPHect EPQ.

    “and this definition can be derived from data collected with the EPHect EPQ.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The EPHect EPQ-S includes a table on lifetime menstrual cycle characteristics while not on hormone medication, across different age ranges, which is not included in the EPHect EPQ-M.

    “The EPHect EPQ-S includes a table on lifetime menstrual cycle characteristics while not on hormone medication, across different age ranges, which is not included in the EPHect EPQ-M.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    A detailed pregnancy history is captured in the EPHect EPQ, including age at the start of each pregnancy, type of fertility treatment used for each pregnancy, if applicable, and pregnancy outcome.

    “A detailed pregnancy history is captured in the EPHect EPQ, including age at the start of each pregnancy, type of fertility treatment used for each pregnancy, if applicable, and pregnancy outcome.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    The EPHect EPQ classifies menstrual flow as spotting, light, moderate, and heavy using a previously validated menstrual pictogram.

    “Therefore, we have classified menstrual flow as spotting, light, moderate, and heavy using a previously validated menstrual pictogram (40).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] Wyatt, 2001, Determination of total menstrual blood loss, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    Age at menarche and menstrual cycle characteristics in the last 3 months are captured in detail on the EPHect EPQ.

    “Age at menarche and menstrual cycle characteristics in the last 3 months are captured in detail on the questionnaire”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given

    Subfertility is assessed in the EPHect EPQ by the longest time (>6 months) a study participant has tried to become pregnant without success and any tests she might have had to find the cause of the sub-fertility.

    “Subfertility is assessed in the EPHect EPQ by the longest time (>6 months) a study participant has tried to become pregnant without success and any tests she might have had to find the cause of the sub-fertility.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Additional details for live births include whether the pregnancy was a multiple gestation, the type of delivery, and pregnancy complications.

    “Additional details for live births include whether the pregnancy was a multiple gestation, the type of delivery, and pregnancy complications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    To capture bowel symptoms that are common in women with endometriosis, questions from the Rome III criteria irritable bowel syndrome module are included.

    “To capture bowel symptoms that are common in women with endometriosis, we have included questions from the Rome III criteria irritable bowel syndrome module (58).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] Drossman, 2006, Rome III: New standard for functional gastrointestinal disorders, J Gastrointestin Liver Dis

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    A diagnostic history for endometriosis is canvassed in detail, including age at first symptoms, age and method of diagnoses, and any prior surgical treatments.

    “A diagnostic history for endometriosis is canvassed in detail, including age at first symptoms, age and method of diagnoses, and any prior surgical treatments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    A family history of endometriosis or of chronic pelvic pain is also obtained.

    “A family history of endometriosis or of chronic pelvic pain is also obtained”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Any occurrence of a structural problem/birth defect of the uterus, cervix, or vagina is ascertained and whether it was surgically repaired.

    “Any occurrence of a structural problem/birth defect of the uterus, cervix, or vagina is also ascertained and whether it was surgically repaired”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    Women are asked about recent bowel and urinary symptoms.

    “Additionally, women are asked about recent bowel and urinary symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    During Workshop II, a consensus was obtained on the final content and format of the questionnaire.

    “During Workshop II, the questionnaire was presented to participants together with a summary of reviews obtained through e-mail consultation, and a consensus was obtained on the final content and format of the questionnaire”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There are a variety of different mechanisms by which pain could be generated in endometriosis, potentially producing discrete pain phenotypes, even though current understanding of these mechanisms is still fragmented.

    “As with many other disorders that involve visceral pain, it has become apparent that there are a variety of different mechanisms by which pain could be generated in endometriosis (Fig. 2) (20), potentially producing discrete “pain phenotypes,” even though our current understanding of these mechanisms is still fragmented.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] Stratton, 2011, Chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis: translational evidence of the relationship and implications, Hum Reprod Update source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both psychological and cognitive factors can modulate-in either a facilitatory or inhibitory manner-the pain experience, and they may also need to be considered.

    “Furthermore, both psychological and cognitive factors can modulate–in either a facilitatory or inhibitory manner–the pain experience, and they may also need to be considered (Fig. 3) (21).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Tracey, 2007, The cerebral signature for pain perception and its modulation, Neuron source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Given variation in quality and complexity of data collected across disparate centers, data pooling may not always be feasible, which can impede scientific progress.

    “Given the variation in quality and complexity of the data collected across disparate centers, data pooling may not always be feasible, which can impede scientific progress.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Collaboration and pooling of individual participant data across research centers can enable much larger sample sizes, can afford subgroup analyses, and is more effective than meta-analyses.

    “Collaboration and pooling of individual participant data across research centers can enable much larger sample sizes, can afford subgroup analyses, and is more effective than meta-analyses (3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Thompson, 2009, Thinking big: large-scale collaborative research in observational epidemiology, Eur J Epidemiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is plausible that pain phenotypes may be characterized by different biomarker profiles or may be responsive to specific treatments only, and therefore a failure to correctly characterize the pain symptoms may obscure a significant result in such studies.

    “It is plausible that these phenotypes may be characterized by different biomarker profiles or may be responsive to specific treatments only, and therefore a failure to correctly characterize the pain symptoms may obscure a significant result in such studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All participants in the consultation were asked to decide which information in the EPHect EPQ should be collected as a minimum (EPQ-M) requirement and which would be recommended as standard (EPQ-S), and a consensus on this division was achieved during Workshop II.

    “All participants in the consultation were asked to decide which information in the EPHect EPQ should be collected as a minimum (EPQ-M) requirement and which would be recommended as standard (EPQ-S), and a consensus on this division was achieved during Workshop II.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The SF-MPQ-2 uses ratings on an 11-point scale, similar to measures of pain intensity, and has seven additional questions that allow calculation of four separate domains (continuous pain, intermittent pain, neuropathic pain, and affective) and a total score, as opposed to the original SF-MPQ which only calculates two domains (sensory and affective) and a total score.

    “we strongly recommend as standard the use of the most recent SF-MPQ-2, as ratings are given on an 11-point scale, similar to the measures of pain intensity, and seven additional questions allow for the calculation of four separate domains (continuous pain, intermittent pain, neuropathic pain, and affective) and a total score”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Dworkin, 2009, Development and initial validation of an expanded and revised version of the Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ-2), Pain source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Recommendations have been published for standard endometriosis-associated pain data collection techniques.

    “Recommendations have been published for standard endometriosis–associated pain data collection techniques (22).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Vincent, 2010, Pain scoring in endometriosis: entry criteria and outcome measures for clinical trials: report from the Art and Science of Endometriosis meeting, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The relationship between endometriosis and pain symptoms is complex, with little correlation between the extent of disease seen at laparoscopy and the severity of pain experienced by the patient.

    “However, the relationship between endometriosis and pain symptoms is complex, with little correlation between the extent of disease seen at laparoscopy and the severity of pain experienced by the patient (18, 19).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [18] Chapron, 2003, Deep infiltrating endometriosis: relation between severity of dysmenorrhoea and extent of disease, Hum Reprod source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] Vercellini, 2007, Association between endometriosis stage, lesion type, patient characteristics and severity of pelvic pain symptoms: a multivariate analysis of over 1000 patients, Hum Reprod source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The EPQ is also relevant to other female conditions with similar risk factors and/or symptomatology.

    “but is also relevant to other female conditions with similar risk factors and/or symptomatology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Standardization and harmonization of phenotypic data and biologic sample collection methods are crucial to allow meaningful comparison between different patient populations and ethnic groups in endometriosis research, and will aid scientific inquiry into etiology and pathogenesis.

    “Moreover, standardization and harmonization of phenotypic data and biologic sample collection methods are crucial to allow meaningful comparison between different patient populations and (ethnic) groups in endometriosis research, and will aid the scientific inquiry into the etiology and pathogenesis of the disease.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Endometriosis is heterogeneous with respect to its natural history, disease burden, extent of inflammation, state of progression, and phenotypic presentation of lesions and symptoms.
    • Rests on an assumption: Important nonsurgical aspects characterize patient subpopulations, including symptomatology and nonsymptomatic phenotypes such as anthropometric characteristics, ethnicity, and reproductive and demographic factors.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Most questions were piloted by patients and volunteers in the centers contributing the questions, and all questions were reviewed by the workshop participants for face validity.

    “In addition, most questions were piloted by patients and volunteers in the centers contributing the questions, and all questions were reviewed by the workshop participants for face validity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Pain catastrophizing is considered a trait measure and thus should not be influenced by the preceding questions.

    “Although pain catastrophizing is considered a trait measure (25) and thus should not be influenced by the preceding questions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Quartana, 2009, Pain catastrophizing: a critical review, Expert Rev Neurother source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Collection of information on psychological state and health-related quality of life in a symptom-based questionnaire can be important as these factors may affect responses related to symptomatology and therefore may be important in patient (symptomatic) stratification.

    “Collection of information on psychological state and health-related quality of life in a symptom-based questionnaire can be important as these factors may affect responses related to symptomatology and therefore may be important in patient (symptomatic) stratification.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The standard definition of infertility is 12 months of regular unprotected intercourse without achieving a clinical pregnancy.

    “The standard definition of infertility is 12 months of regular unprotected intercourse without achieving a clinical pregnancy (45)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [45] Zegers-Hochschild, 2009, The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009, Hum Reprod source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Early life menstrual cycle characteristics and their change over time may be important in the etiology of endometriosis.

    “because early life menstrual cycle characteristics and their change over time may be important in the etiology of endometriosis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The FIGO classification for volume of menstrual flow is heavy (>80 mL), normal (5-80 mL), and light (<5 mL).

    “The FIGO classification for volume of menstrual flow is heavy (>80 mL), normal (5–80 mL), and light (<5 mL)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Fraser, 2011, The FIGO recommendations on terminologies and definitions for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding, Semin Reprod Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The FIGO recommendation for defining normal menstruation and menstrual cycle characteristics includes four parameters: regularity of menses, frequency of menses, and duration and heaviness of menstrual flow.

    “The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) recommendation for defining normal menstruation and menstrual cycle characteristics includes four parameters: regularity of menses, frequency of menses, and duration and heaviness of menstrual flow (39).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [39] Fraser, 2011, The FIGO recommendations on terminologies and definitions for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding, Semin Reprod Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationcitation

    Subfertility and endometriosis may have a common origin, as suggested by evidence linking in-utero exposures with endometriosis.

    “In fact, subfertility and endometriosis may have a common origin, as suggested by evidence linking in-utero exposures with endometriosis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In prospective studies, increasing number of live births has been linearly associated with decreasing incidence of endometriosis.

    “In prospective studies, increasing number of live births has been linearly associated with decreasing incidence of endometriosis (38).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [38] Missmer, 2004, Reproductive history and endometriosis among premenopausal women, Obstet Gynecol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) can be used as a combined measure to save time and/or space, but it has been argued that this is more useful as a measure of overall psychological distress than for accurately determining the degree of anxiety and depression.

    “Alternatively, to save time and/or space, a combined measure such as the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (32) can be used, but it has been argued that this is more useful as a measure of overall psychological distress than for accurately determining the degree of anxiety and depression (33).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [32] Zigmond, 1983, The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Acta Psychiatr Scand source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [33] Cosco, 2012, Latent structure of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a 10-year systematic review, J Psychosom Res source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Validated depression and anxiety scales that can be helpful for patient stratification include the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), both of which are also considered valid for healthy controls.

    “Additionally, validated depression and anxiety scales that can be helpful for patient stratification include measures such as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (30) and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (31), both of which are also considered valid for healthy controls.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [30] Beck, 1996, Comparison of Beck Depression Inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients, J Pers Assess source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [31] Spielberger, 1983

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Menstrual cycle characteristics are likely to influence symptom reporting.

    “[2] are likely to influence symptom reporting”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The pain catastrophizing scale is valid and relevant for both patients and healthy controls, acceptable to patients/controls, and comprises only 13 questions.

    “As the pain catastrophizing scale is valid and relevant for both patients and healthy controls (referring to any pain experienced rather than to pelvic pain specifically), acceptable to patients/controls, and comprises of only 13 questions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Quartana, 2009, Pain catastrophizing: a critical review, Expert Rev Neurother source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Surgical history (the age at each surgery, the type of surgery, and its indication) can be etiologically related to pelvic pain symptoms and impact on symptom reporting.

    “Surgical history (the age at each surgery, the type of surgery, and its indication) can be etiologically related to pelvic pain symptoms and impact on symptom reporting.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Bowel and urinary symptoms are important to capture for defining case subpopulations.

    “and these are important to capture for defining case subpopulations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Greater body size is associated with a decreased risk of endometriosis.

    “Greater body size and adolescent weight have both been shown to be associated with a decreased risk of endometriosis (66, 70).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [66] Shah, 2013, Body size and endometriosis: results from 20 years of follow-up within the Nurses' Health Study II prospective cohort, Hum Reprod source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [70] Vitonis, 2010, A prospective study of body size during childhood and early adulthood and the incidence of endometriosis, Hum Reprod source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Hair and eye color are associated with endometriosis.

    “Two questions on hair and eye color, previously associated with endometriosis (71–75) and possibly useful in marking genetic subpopulations, are also included.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [71] Kvaskoff, 2009, Endometriosis risk in relation to naevi, freckles and skin sensitivity to sun exposure: the French E3N cohort, Int J Epidemiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [72] Missmer, 2006, Natural hair color and the incidence of endometriosis, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [73] Somigliana, 2010, ‘Here comes the sun’: pigmentary traits and sun habits in women with endometriosis, Hum Reprod source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [74] Woodworth, 1995, A prospective study on the association between red hair color and endometriosis in infertile patients, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [75] Wyshak, 2000, Red hair color, melanoma, and endometriosis: suggestive associations, Int J Dermatol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Retrospective studies have suggested that women with endometriosis may have higher rates of maternal complications and fetal problems such as preeclampsia and miscarriage, though these associations need further study.

    “Retrospective studies have suggested that women with endometriosis may have higher rates of maternal complications and fetal problems such as preeclampsia and miscarriage (46–50), though these associations need further study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [46] Fernando, 2009, Preterm birth, ovarian endometriomata, and assisted reproduction technologies, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [47] Stephansson, 2009, Endometriosis, assisted reproduction technology, and risk of adverse pregnancy outcome, Hum Reprod source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] Tomassetti, 2006, Endometriosis, recurrent miscarriage and implantation failure: is there an immunological link?, Reprod Biomed Online source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [49] Vercellini, 2012, Pregnancy outcome in women with peritoneal, ovarian and rectovaginal endometriosis: a retrospective cohort study, Br J Obstet Gynaecol source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [50] Brosens, 2012, Risks of adverse pregnancy outcome in endometriosis, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Experimental data suggest that anti-inflammatory drugs may affect the severity of endometriosis.

    “Moreover, experimental data suggest that anti-inflammatory drugs may affect the severity of the disease (61, 62).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [61] Olivares, 2011, The inhibitory effect of celecoxib and rosiglitazone on experimental endometriosis, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [62] Ozawa, 2006, A selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor suppresses the growth of endometriosis xenografts via antiangiogenic activity in severe combined immunodeficiency mice, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Alcohol use is associated with endometriosis in a prospective study.

    “Smoking and alcohol use, which have been associated with endometriosis in a prospective study (76), are captured as former and current smoking and packs per day as well as current number of alcoholic drinks per week.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76] Missmer, 2004, Incidence of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis by demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors, Am J Epidemiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The questionnaire can be completed by any woman undergoing investigation for symptoms of endometriosis (whether she has the disease or not), or asymptomatic women, subject to signed written informed consent obtained from each patient and local ethics approval for the study according to ethical principles for clinical research summarized in the Declaration of Helsinki.

    “The questionnaire can be completed by any woman undergoing investigation for symptoms of endometriosis (whether she has the disease or not), or asymptomatic women, subject to signed written informed consent obtained from each patient and local ethics approval for the study according to ethical principles for clinical research summarized in the Declaration of Helsinki.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Smoking is associated with endometriosis in a prospective study.

    “Smoking and alcohol use, which have been associated with endometriosis in a prospective study (76), are captured as former and current smoking and packs per day as well as current number of alcoholic drinks per week.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76] Missmer, 2004, Incidence of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis by demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors, Am J Epidemiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Standardization of phenotypic data collection across studies of endometriosis will promote large-scale research using multiple data sets characterized using the same phenotypic definitions and will simplify interpretation of concordant or discordant results among data sets.

    “This standardization will promote large-scale research using multiple data sets that are characterized using the same phenotypic definitions and will simplify interpretation of concordant or discordant results among data sets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    If adopted by research centers across the globe, the EPHect EPQ will aid in the design and conduction of large, multicenter, geographically diverse studies with high reliability and validity.

    “If adopted by research centers across the globe, the EPHect EPQ will aid in the design and conduction of large, multicenter, geographically diverse studies with high reliability and validity, conducted on behalf of the millions of girls and women struggling with endometriosis and its associated symptoms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    These categories may not sufficiently capture all populations where this questionnaire will be used.

    “However, we realize these categories may not sufficiently capture all populations where this questionnaire will be used.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The EPQ is not designed for use in clinical practice to inform immediate clinical decisions.

    “The EPQ is not designed for use in clinical practice to inform immediate clinical decisions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: None of the longstanding, validated component parts of the EPQ have been applied in an immediate point-of-care setting.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    Race/ethnicity is assessed with categories previously used in a worldwide study.

    “Race/ethnicity is assessed with categories previously used in a worldwide study (63).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] Nnoaham, 2011, Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and work productivity: a multicenter study across ten countries, Fertil Steril source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The questionnaire was not designed to accommodate in-clinic completion and immediate review.

    “However, the questionnaire was not designed to accommodate in-clinic completion and immediate review, as this is beyond the scope and inconsistent with the goals of EPHect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: None of the longstanding, validated component parts of the EPQ have been applied in an immediate point-of-care setting.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The EPHect EPQ captures details on pain, menstrual and reproductive history, medical history, hormone use and infertility, and demographics and lifestyle characteristics and is sufficient to capture the minimum nonsurgical clinical phenome in endometriosis cases and controls.

    “The EPHect EPQ captures details on pain, menstrual and reproductive history, medical history, hormone use and infertility, and demographics and lifestyle characteristics and is sufficient to capture the minimum nonsurgical clinical phenome in endometriosis cases and controls.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The demographic data required for interpretation of any epidemiologic study result include age, race/ethnicity, major ancestry, and highest level of education attained.
61 of 61
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Endometriosis is heterogeneous with respect to its natural history, disease burden, extent of inflammation, state of progression, and phenotypic presentation of lesions and symptoms.

    “It is generally accepted that endometriosis is a heterogeneous disease with respect to its natural history, disease burden, extent of inflammation, state of progression, and phenotypic presentation of lesions and symptoms.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Important nonsurgical aspects characterize patient subpopulations, including symptomatology and nonsymptomatic phenotypes such as anthropometric characteristics, ethnicity, and reproductive and demographic factors.

    “There are important nonsurgical aspects that characterize patient (sub)populations, including symptomatology (onset, duration, extent and severity of symptoms, comorbidity) and other nonsymptomatic phenotypes such as anthropometric characteristics, ethnicity, and reproductive and demographic factors.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Women with endometriosis experience a variety of pain symptoms, most commonly dysmenorrhea, noncyclical pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and dyschezia.

    “Women with endometriosis experience a variety of pain symptoms, most commonly dysmenorrhea, noncyclical pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and dyschezia.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The three main mechanisms generating pain are nociceptive, inflammatory, and neuropathic or centrally generated pain.

    “The three main mechanisms generating pain are [1] nociceptive, [2] inflammatory, and [3] neuropathic or centrally generated pain”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Comorbidity is an important potential confounding factor in assessing symptom extent and severity.

    “Comorbidity is an important potential confounding factor in assessing symptom extent and severity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Older women or women already known to have conditions that can lead to infertility might not try for 12 months before seeking medical intervention.

    “as older women (such as women >35 years old) or women already known to have conditions that can lead to infertility might not try for 12 months before seeking medical intervention”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Accuracy of diagnosis has varied across generations.

    “while recognizing that accuracy of diagnosis has varied across generations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Some drugs may interact with the biomarkers to be studied and may thus distort the results.

    “Collecting information on recent medication use is important for biomarker research as some drugs may interact with the biomarkers to be studied and may thus distort the results.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Medications for chronic pain or inflammatory conditions or for other symptoms, such as depression or anxiety, may affect pain reporting.

    “Medications for chronic pain or inflammatory conditions or for other symptoms, such as depression or anxiety, may affect pain reporting.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The demographic data required for interpretation of any epidemiologic study result include age, race/ethnicity, major ancestry, and highest level of education attained.

    “The demographic data that are required for interpretation of any epidemiologic study result include age, race/ethnicity, major ancestry, and highest level of education attained, and are collected on the EPHect EPQ.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    None of the longstanding, validated component parts of the EPQ have been applied in an immediate point-of-care setting.

    “Additionally, to our knowledge, none of the longstanding, validated component parts of the EPQ have been applied in an immediate point-of-care setting.”
11 of 11

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, the World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project (EPHect) has developed a consensus on standardisation and harmonisation of phenotypic surgical/clinical data and biologic sample collection methods in endometriosis research.

    “Recently, the World Endometriosis Research Foundation (WERF) Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project (EPHect) has developed a consensus on standardisation and harmonisation of phenotypic surgical/clinical data and biologic sample collection methods in endometriosis research [146, 147, 149, 150].”

    From Update on biomarkers for the detection of endometriosis (2015) · cites this paper as [150]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Two distinct companion papers have identical publication identifiers

    Minor

    References 13 and 14 describe different papers-parts III and IV-but assign both the same PMCID and PMID. Those identifiers cannot uniquely identify both papers.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 81 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vitonis, A. F., Vincent, K., Rahmioglu, N., Fassbender, A., Buck Louis, G. M., Hummelshoj, L., Giudice, L. C., Stratton, P., Adamson, G. D., Becker, C. M., Zondervan, K. T., Missmer, S. A., Adamson, G. D., Allaire, C., Anchan, R., Becker, C. M., Bedaiwy, M. A., Buck Louis, G. M., Calhaz-Jorge, C., Chwalisz, K., D'Hooghe, T. M., Fassbender, A., Faustmann, T., Fazleabas, A. T., Flores, I., Forman, A., Fraser, I., Giudice, L. C., Gotte, M., Gregersen, P., Guo, S.-W., Harada, T., Hartwell, D., Horne, A. W., Hull, M. L., Hummelshoj, L., Ibrahim, M. G., Kiesel, L., Laufer, M. R., Machens, K., Mechsner, S., Missmer, S. A., Montgomery, G. W., Nap, A., Nyegaard, M., Osteen, K. G., Petta, C. A., Rahmioglu, N., Renner, S. P., Riedlinger, J., Roehrich, S., Rogers, P. A., Rombauts, L., Salumets, A., Saridogan, E., Seckin, T., Stratton, P., Sharpe-Timms, K. L., Tworoger, S., Vigano, P., Vincent, K., Vitonis, A. F., Wienhues-Thelen, U.-H., Yeung, P. P., Yong, P., & Zondervan, K. T.
Affiliations
  • World Endometriosis Research Foundation (GB)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hartwell, D.
  • Mechsner, S.
  • Nyegaard, M.
  • Roehrich, S.
  • Tworoger, S.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
102
Issue
5
Pages
1223-1232
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2164565395
Cited by
236
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ernst Schering Foundation
  • J. Willard and Alice S. Marriott Foundation
  • Roche
  • Health Technology Assessment Programme
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Puerto Rico Science, Technology and Research Trust (2013-000032)
  • Wellcome Trust (WT085235/Z/08/Z)
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K011480/1)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Chief Scientist Office
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD57210)
  • Astellas Pharma US
  • Boston Center for Endometriosis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
Keywords
endometriosis, pelvic pain, subfertility, menstrual history, reproductive history, hormone use, medical history, biobanking, international research collaboration
MeSH terms
Education, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Medical History Taking, Phenotype, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Information Storage and Retrieval, Biomedical Research, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review