Is early age at menarche a risk factor for endometriosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To review published studies evaluating early menarche and the risk of endometriosis. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. SETTING: None. PATIENT(S): Eighteen case-control studies of age at menarche and risk of endometriosis including 3,805 women with endometriosis and 9,526 controls. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Medline and Embase databases were searched from 1980 to 2011 to locate relevant studies. Results of primary studies were expressed as effect sizes of the difference in mean age at menarche of women with and without endometriosis. Effect sizes were used in random effects meta-analysis. RESULT(S): Eighteen of 45 articles retrieved met the inclusion criteria. The pooled effect size in meta-analysis was 0.10 (95% confidence interval -0.01-0.21), and not significantly different from zero (no effect). Results were influenced by substantial heterogeneity between studies (I(2) = 72.5%), which was eliminated by restricting meta-analysis to studies with more rigorous control of confounders; this increased the pooled effect size to 0.15 (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.22), which was significantly different from zero. This represents a probability of 55% that a woman with endometriosis had earlier menarche than one without endometriosis if both were randomly chosen from a population. CONCLUSION(S): There is a small increased risk of endometriosis with early menarche. The potential for disease misclassification in primary studies suggests that this risk could be higher.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Age at menarche and menstrual cycle characteristics have been robustly associated with endometriosis.
“as they [1] have been robustly associated with endometriosis (34–38)”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 174
- Authors
- Nnoaham, K. E., Webster, P., Kumbang, J., Kennedy, S. H., & Zondervan, K. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Nnoaham, Kelechi E.
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-09
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 702-712.e6
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3502866
- OpenAlex
- W2160249159
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7
- FWCI
- 0.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (085235, 090532)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Keywords
- endometriosis, age at menarche, early menarche, risk factors, disease misclassification, confounding
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Child, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Menarche, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review