Cited by 383Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyReproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Impact of frozen-thawed single-blastocyst transfer on maternal and neonatal outcome: an analysis of 277,042 single-embryo transfer cycles from 2008 to 2010 in Japan

Open access
Ishihara, Osamu, Araki, Ryuichiro, Kuwahara, Akira, Itakura, Atsuo, Saito, Hidekazu, Adamson, G. David·2014·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the relationship between frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer (BT) and maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancy.Design Retrospective analysis.Setting Japanese nationwide registry of assisted reproductive technology (ART) with mandatory reporting for all ART clinics in Japan.Patient(s) Registered from 2008 through 2010 undergoing single embryo transfer cycles (n = 277,042).Intervention(s) None.Main outcome measure(s) Rates of preterm birth (PTB; <37 weeks' gestation), low birth weight (LBW; <2,500 g), small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), placenta previa, placenta abruption, placenta accreta, and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) after fresh/frozen-thawed and cleaved-embryo/blastocyst transfers were performed.Result(s) Frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) was associated with a significantly reduced occurrence of PTB, LBW, and SGA but increased rate of LGA. FET was also associated with a higher incidence of placenta accreta (odds ratio 3.16) and PIH (odds ratio 1.58). BT was associated with a significantly decreased rate of SGA and increased rate of LGA. There was no significant association between BT and maternal complications.Conclusion(s) Frozen-thawed BT is associated with improved general perinatal outcomes of pregnancy but significantly increased maternal risks of placenta accreta and PIH. This finding requires further investigation to assure maternal safety of patients undergoing ART treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.025

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other additional risk factors for placenta accreta spectrum include maternal age and ART, in particular in vitro fertilisation.

    “Other additional risk factors include maternal age 110,113,117,120 and ART, in particular in vitro fertilisation.113,120,122-125”

    From Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management: Green‐top Guideline No. 27a (2019) · cites this paper as [124]

    Table 4 associates frozen-thawed embryo transfer with higher odds of placenta accreta than fresh transfer among pregnancies after assisted reproduction. It does not establish IVF or ART as a risk factor relative to pregnancies without ART. The same table finds no association between maternal age and placenta accreta (adjusted odds ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.94–1.05). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [11]11. Itabashi K, et al. New standard of average size and weight of newborn in Japan. Jap J Pediat 2010;114:1271-93.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ishihara, O., Araki, R., Kuwahara, A., Itakura, A., Saito, H., & Adamson, G. D.
Affiliations
  • Saitama Medical University (JP)
  • Tokushima University (JP)
  • National Center For Child Health and Development (JP)
Corresponding author
Ishihara, Osamu
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
128-133
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974978813
Cited by
383
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11
FWCI
15.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2014-04-01)
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
frozen embryo transfer, single blastocyst transfer, single embryo transfer, preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, placenta accreta, placenta previa, placental abruption, gestational hypertension, maternal complications, neonatal outcomes, assisted reproduction
MeSH terms
Adult, Embryo Transfer, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Japan, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Cryopreservation, Single Embryo Transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review