Cited by 21Ovarian function and disordersDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

Changes in diet composition with urbanization and its effect on the polycystic ovarian syndrome phenotype in a Western Indian population

Open access
Kulkarni, Sachin D., Patil, Ajit N., Gudi, Anil, Homburg, Roy, Conway, Gerard S.·2019·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To study the effects of increasingly prosperous diet content on clinical features of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Design A cross-sectional cohort study of 711 women with PCOS from a heterogeneous population spanning a wide spectrum of socioeconomic strata. Setting Independent hospital. Patient(s) A total of 711 women with PCOS in whom the diagnosis was based on Rotterdam criteria. Results were compared with a locally recruited reference group. Intervention(s) Clinical assessment of women with PCOS. Main outcome measure(s) Clinical characteristics were assessed with particular reference to diet composition. Four diet groups were identified: simple rice with vegetables, vegetarian with mixed carbohydrates, nonvegetarian with mixed carbohydrates, and an urban diet of processed foods. Result(s) Women with PCOS showed the characteristic features of raised LH and androstenedione concentrations and increased ovarian volume and antral follicle count. There was a notable association between an increasingly affluent diet, the presence of hirsutism, raised body mass index, insulin resistance, and higher serum antimüllerian hormone concentrations. The positive association between antimüllerian hormone and body mass index is an unusual feature possibly explained by the wide spectrum of lifestyles in this cohort. Conclusion(s) Urbanization of women in India is associated with increasingly severe phenotype of PCOS, which is likely to have implications on fertility outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.05.021

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kulkarni, S. D., Patil, A. N., Gudi, A., Homburg, R., & Conway, G. S.
Affiliations
  • Homerton University Hospital (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Conway, Gerard S.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
112
Issue
4
Pages
758-763
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2964132071
Cited by
21
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, diet composition, urbanization, Western diet, processed foods, socioeconomic status, insulin resistance, hirsutism, body mass index, anti-Müllerian hormone, androstenedione, luteinizing hormone, antral follicle count, ovarian volume, fertility outcomes, Indian women
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Female, Humans, India, Insulin Resistance, Phenotype, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Social Class, Urbanization, Cohort Studies, Body Mass Index, Anti-Mullerian Hormone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review