Cited by 45Ovarian function and disordersBariatric Surgery and OutcomesEndometriosis Research and Treatment

Effect of sleeve gastrectomy bariatric surgery-induced weight loss on serum AMH levels in reproductive aged women

Bhandari, Shilpa, Ganguly, Ishita, Bhandari, Mohit, Agarwal, Pallavi, Singh, Aparna, Gupta, Nitika, Mishra, Arun·2016·Gynecological Endocrinology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the change in serum anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) levels in patients with morbid obesity undergoing bariatric surgery for weight loss. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 75 patients of reproductive age (20-35 years) undergoing bariatric surgery for morbid obesity were followed up after six months to determine the changes in weight, Body Mass Index (BMI), menstrual pattern and serum AMH. The results were further studied on basis of pre operative classification of patients in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and non-PCOS group. RESULT: The serum AMH levels were statistically higher in patients of PCOS group pre operatively and at the end of six months in comparison to non-PCOS patients. The AMH values reduced post operatively in both groups significantly so much in the values though not significant statistically. Non-PCOS patients had lower AMH values pre operatively and showed a trend towards reducing ovarian reserve after six months. The overall change in AMH values in both groups was statistically significant as was the normalization of menstrual irregularity. CONCLUSION: Morbidly obese patients with PCOS appear to benefit from bariatric surgery both in terms of regularization of menstrual function and normalization of serum AMH values.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09513590.2016.1169267

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One study reported a statistically significant difference in BMI following bariatric surgery (p = 0.013), with women with PCOS having a lower BMI post-surgery than women without PCOS.

    “One study reported a statistically significant difference in BMI following bariatric surgery (p = 0.013), with women with PCOS having a lower BMI post-surgery than women without PCOS [45].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhandari, S., Ganguly, I., Bhandari, M., Agarwal, P., Singh, A., Gupta, N., & Mishra, A.
Affiliations
Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Bhandari, Shilpa
Venue
Gynecological Endocrinology
Published
2016-04-17
Volume
32
Issue
10
Pages
799-802
ISSN
  • 0951-3590 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0766
OpenAlex
W2339324311
Cited by
45
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Gynecological Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
Keywords
sleeve gastrectomy, bariatric surgery, anti-Müllerian hormone, morbid obesity, polycystic ovary syndrome, ovarian reserve, menstrual irregularity, weight loss, women of reproductive age
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gastrectomy, Humans, Menstruation Disturbances, Obesity, Morbid, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Weight Loss, Treatment Outcome, Bariatric Surgery, Anti-Mullerian Hormone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review