Cited by 24Reproductive System and PregnancyReproductive Biology and FertilityReproductive Health and Technologies

B-cell lymphoma 6 expression is not associated with live birth in a normal responder in vitro fertilization population

Open access
Klimczak, Amber M., Herlihy, Nola S., Scott, Cynthia S., Hanson, Brent M., Kim, Julia G., Titus, Shiny, Seli, Emre, Scott, Richard Thomas·2022·Fertility and Sterility

Abstract

Objective To determine whether increased endometrial B-cell lymphoma 6 (BCL6) expression is associated with live birth in a normal responder in vitro fertilization (IVF) population.Design Case-control study.Setting University-affiliated infertility center.Patient(s) Two groups of women undergoing IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy followed by warmed, single, euploid embryo transfer. Group 1 consisted of women who failed to achieve live birth, and group 2 consisted of women who achieved live birth.Intervention(s) None.Main outcome measure(s) Endometrial BCL6 expression measured by immunohistochemistry in endometrial tissue samples. Overexpression was defined by mean HSCORE with a cutoff of positivity of >1.4, as previously described in the literature.Result(s) Twenty-seven patients who achieved live birth and 23 patients who failed to achieve live birth were included. B-cell lymphoma 6 expression/HSCORE and live birth rate were not associated (Odds ratio [OR], 0.78 [0.24-2.55]). Using a cutoff of >1.4 for positivity, 8 of 23 samples were positive for BCL6 in the no live birth group, whereas 7 of 27 were positive in the live birth group. There was no significant association between BCL6 positivity and live birth (OR, 0.66 [0.19-2.21]).Conclusion(s) The proportion of patients with BCL6 positivity did not significantly differ between those who achieved live birth and those who did not. In the population of patients at our center, who compromise of women who respond normally to IVF stimulation, BCL6 overexpression was not associated with IVF success. Physicians implementing BCL6 testing as a diagnostic tool for clinical decision making should counsel patients that results may have limited utility in predicting IVF outcomes in this population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.09.036

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BCL6 overexpression in the endometrium did not truly predict endometrial receptivity when frozen euploid blastocysts were transferred.

    “This too failed to truly predict endometrial receptivity when frozen euploid blastocysts were transferred.”

    From Endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis and/or endometriosis (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

  • In patients with BCL6-positive biopsies, embryo implantation and live birth rates did not significantly differ from those with BCL6-negative biopsies.

    “Klimczak et al. (16) reported that embryo implantation and live birth rates (LBRs) in patients with BCL6 positive biopsies did not significantly differ from those in patients whose biopsies were negative.”

    From Endometrial receptivity in adenomyosis and/or endometriosis (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klimczak, A. M., Herlihy, N. S., Scott, C. S., Hanson, B. M., Kim, J. G., Titus, S., Seli, E., & Scott, R. T.
Affiliations
  • Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Klimczak, Amber M.
Venue
Fertility and Sterility
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
351-358
ISSN
0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3215120206
Cited by
24
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Fertility and Sterility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
B-cell lymphoma 6, endometrium, in vitro fertilization, live birth, IVF outcome prediction, normal responders, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, embryo transfer, endometrial biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Endometrium, Female, Fertility, Fertilization in Vitro, Humans, Infertility, Male, Embryo Implantation, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Pregnancy Rate, Live Birth, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-6, Young Adult, Single Embryo Transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review