Inherent bias in using aggregate CPUE to characterize abundance of fish species assemblages
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The exceeding of aggregate decline estimates over individual species estimates was likely due to the characteristics of aggregate CPUE metrics.
“likely due to the characteristics of aggregate CPUE metrics (Kleiber & Maunder 2008)”
From Patterns and drivers of the demersal fish community of Chesapeake Bay (2013) · cites this paper as Kleiber & Maunder 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Patterns and drivers of the demersal fish community of Chesapeake Bay
Buchheister, A., Bonzek, C., Gartland, J., & Latour, R. (2013) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps10253 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kleiber, P., & Maunder, M. N.
- Affiliations
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
- Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kleiber, Pierre
- ORCID
- Maunder, Mark N.
- Venue
- Fisheries Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 140-145
- ISSN
- 0165-7836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133443904
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fisheries Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Keywords
- catch per unit effort, multispecies fisheries, abundance estimation, fishing effort
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review