Cited by 42Marine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology StudiesCensus and Population Estimation

Estimating growth of tropical tunas in the Indian Ocean using tag-recapture data and otolith-based age estimates

Eveson, J. Paige, Million, Julien, Sardenne, Fany, Le Croizier, Gaël·2015·Fisheries Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.05.016

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Eveson, J. P., Million, J., Sardenne, F., & Le Croizier, G.
Affiliations
  • Indian Ocean Tuna Commission (SC)
  • Ifremer (FR)
Corresponding author
Eveson, J. Paige
Venue
Fisheries Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
163
Pages
58-68
ISSN
0165-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2018045728
Cited by
42
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Fisheries Research (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
Keywords
tropical tuna, yellowfin tuna, bigeye tuna, skipjack tuna, fish growth, length-at-age, tag-recapture, otolith age, sex differences in growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review