Conceptual and practical advances in fish stock delineation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The combination of different approaches has proved to be a powerful and reliable way to clarify unresolved questions related to stock structure.
“the combination of different approaches has proved to be a powerful and reliable way to clarify unresolved questions related to stock structure (Welch et al., 2015; Pita et al., 2016; Izzo et al., 2017; Proctor et al., 2019)”
From A review of the fisheries, life history and stock structure of tropical tuna (skipjack Katsuwonus pelamis, yellowfin Thunnus albacares and bigeye Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean (2021) · cites this paper as Pita et al., 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Pita, A., Casey, J., Hawkins, S. J., Villarreal, M. R., Gutiérrez, M.-J., Cabral, H., Carocci, F., Abaunza, P., Pascual, S., & Presa, P.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de Vigo (ES)
- European Commission (BE)
- National Oceanography Centre (GB)
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
- Instituto Español de Oceanografía (ES)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Pita, Alfonso
- Casey, John
- Hawkins, Stephen J.
- Cabral, Henrique
- Carocci, Fabio
- Abaunza, Pablo
- Pascual, Santiago
- Presa, Pablo
- Venue
- Fisheries Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 173
- Pages
- 185-193
- ISSN
- 0165-7836 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2251659177
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fisheries Research (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Consellería de Educación e Ordenación Universitaria da Xunta de Galicia
- European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
- Keywords
- population structure, genetic markers, geochemical tracers, morphometrics, parasitology, life-history traits, metapopulation, stock assessment, fisheries management, oceanographic processes, GIS-based modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
