Cited by 59Marine and fisheries researchMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFish Ecology and Management Studies

Growth: Theory, estimation, and application in fishery stock assessment models

Maunder, Mark N., Crone, Paul R., Punt, Andre E., Valero, Juan L., Semmens, Brice X.·2016·Fisheries Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fishres.2016.03.005

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Authors
Maunder, M. N., Crone, P. R., Punt, A. E., Valero, J. L., & Semmens, B. X.
Affiliations
  • Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
  • Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
Corresponding author
Maunder, Mark N.
Venue
Fisheries Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
180
Pages
1-3
ISSN
0165-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2299216427
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fisheries Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
fish stock assessment, population growth models, population dynamics, model selection, model uncertainty, process uncertainty, observational uncertainty, recruitment (biology), natural mortality, stock-recruitment relationship, prior distributions, good practice guidelines, fisheries management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review