Cited by 28Marine and fisheries researchReproductive biology and impacts on aquatic speciesFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Spatiotemporal variability in the reproductive dynamics of Skipjack Tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the eastern Pacific Ocean

Schaefer, Kurt M., Fuller, Daniel W.·2019·Fisheries Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.09.002

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Anonymous, 2017, The fishery for tunas and billfishes in the eastern Pacific Ocean in 2016, Int. Am. Trop. Tuna Commission Document SAC-08-03, 51
  2. Farley, 1998, Reproductive dynamics of southern bluefin tuna, Thunnus maccoyii, Fish. Bull., 96, 223
  3. Lambert, 2000, Nutritional condition and reproductive success in wild fish populations, Proc. 6th Int. Symp. Reproductive Physiol. Fish. John Grieg, 77
  4. Maunder, 2017, Updated indicators for stock status of skipjack tuna in the eastern Pacific Ocean, Int. Am. Trop. Tuna Commission Document SAC-08-04c, 4
  5. Maunder, 2007, Using indicators of stock status when traditional reference points are not available: evaluation and application to skipjack tuna in the eastern Pacific Ocean, Int.-Am. Trop. Tuna Commission Stock Assess. Rep., 8, 229
  6. Morrison, 1990, Histology of the Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua: an atlas. Part three. Reproductive tract, Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 110, 177
  7. Nishikawa, 1985, Average distribution of larvae of oceanic species of scombroid fishes, 1956–1981, Far Seas Fish. Res. Lab., S Ser., 12, 99
  8. Rothschild, 1965, Hypotheses on the origin of exploited skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) in the eastern and central Pacific Ocean, U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv., Spec. Sci. Rep. Fish., 512
  9. Schaefer, 1996, Spawning time, frequency, and batch fecundity of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, near Clipperton Island Atoll in the eastern Pacific Ocean, Fish. Bull., 94, 98
  10. Schaefer, 2001, Assessment of skipjack tuna (Katsuwonus pelamis) spawning activity in the eastern Pacific Ocean, Fish. Bull., 99, 343
  11. Schaefer, 2008, Stock structure of bigeye, yellowfin, and skipjack tunas in the eastern Pacific Ocean, Int.-Am. Trop. Tuna Commission Stock Assess. Rept., 9, 203
  12. Yoshida, 1960, Marquesas area fishery and environmental data, January-March 1959, U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Spec. Sci. Rep. Fish, 348, 37

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Schaefer, K. M., & Fuller, D. W.
Affiliations
Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (US)
Corresponding author
Schaefer, Kurt M.
Venue
Fisheries Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
209
Pages
1-13
ISSN
0165-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2892183816
Cited by
28
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fisheries Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
skipjack tuna, reproductive dynamics, spawning, spatiotemporal variation, sex ratio, relative fecundity, batch fecundity, spawning frequency, spawning interval, eastern Pacific, purse seine fishing, oocyte histology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review