Cited by 67Marine and fisheries researchMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFish Ecology and Management Studies

Modeling temporal variation in recruitment in fisheries stock assessment: a review of theory and practice

Maunder, Mark N., Thorson, James T.·2019·Fisheries Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.fishres.2018.12.014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maunder, M. N., & Thorson, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
Corresponding author
Maunder, Mark N.
Venue
Fisheries Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
217
Pages
71-86
ISSN
0165-7836 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2906182840
Cited by
67
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fisheries Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
recruitment (biology), temporal variation, fish stock assessment, stock-recruitment relationship, density dependence, virtual population analysis, surplus production model, state-space model, hierarchical models, tipping points, autocorrelation, fisheries advice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review