Cited by 714Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

A review of size dependant survival during pre-recruit stages of fishes in relation to recruitment

Open access
Anderson, J T·1988·Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science

Abstract

The theory of recruitment in fishes and hypotheses pertaining to causes of recruitment fluctuation are summarized.In spite of considerable research effort over several decades there has been no significant improvement in identifying clear causal mechanisms of recruitment in marine fish stocks.Starvation has not been demonstrated to be a primary mechanism controlling survival of fish larvae.Studies matching food levels and year-class strength continue to provide indirect evidence that growth during the first year of life is dependent on food supply and may be important in determining survival.The hypothesis that survival is a direct function of growth provides a rational theoretical framework for recruitment research and is suggested as a basis for future work.Growth rate must be studied as a function of both ration and temperature.Studies examining the relationship of growth rate to survival should be specific to each life history stage and ideally integrated throughout the pre-recruit period.It remains to be demonstrated that survival is a direct function of growth, mediated through size-dependent predation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2960/j.v8.a6

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bigeye tuna recruits experience exceedingly high mortality throughout the hatching and early life stages.

    “It is worth noting that the recruits experience exceedingly high mortality throughout the hatching and early life stages (Anderson, 1988; Russo et al., 2022; Shropshire et al., 2022).”

    From Impacts of phytoplankton availability on bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) recruitment in the Indian Ocean (2024) · cites this paper as Anderson, 1988

    The Size dependent mortality section says mortality generally decreases as marine fish grow, and Present Understanding Starvation reports very high mortality among first-feeding larvae of some species. The paper does not establish that bigeye tuna specifically experience exceedingly high mortality throughout hatching and early life stages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Larger fish can better evade predation, are less susceptible to starvation, and are more efficient foragers.

    “Larger fish can better evade predation, are less susceptible to starvation, and are more efficient foragers [9].”

    From Subyearling Chinook salmon diets in Lower Columbia River estuarine habitats (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Size dependent mortality section reports that larger larvae more often escape predator attacks, supporting the predation part of the claim. The passages on starvation and feeding discuss food availability, growth, and survival, but do not establish that larger fish are less susceptible to starvation or are more efficient foragers. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The feeding success of larvae is one of the most important processes in their survival.

    “The feeding success of larvae is one of the most important processes in their survival (Anderson, 1988; Llopiz and Hobday, 2015).”
  • Faster-growing individuals are favored over slower-growing individuals, the latter being exposed for a longer time to a vulnerable status characterized by higher mortality rates induced by predation and harder feeding conditions.

    “During this phase, faster-growing individuals are favored over slower-growing individuals, the latter being exposed for a longer time to a vulnerable status, characterized by higher mortality rates induced by predation and harder feeding conditions [2].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. BACKIEL, T., and E. D. Le CREN. 1967. Some density relation- ships for fish population parameters. In: The biological basis of freshwater fish production (p. 261-293), S. D. Gerking (ed.). John Wiley Sons Inc., New York.
  2. BAGENAL, T. B. 1973. Fish fecundity and its relations with stock and recruitment. ICES Rapp. Proc.-Verb., 164: 186- 198.
  3. BAILEY, K. M., and E. D. HOUDE. 1988. Predation on eggs and larvae of marine fishes and the recruitment problem. Adv. Mar. Bioi. (in press).
  4. BAKUN, A., and R. H. PARRISH. 1980. Environmental inputs to fishery population models for eastern boundary cur- rent regions. In: Workshop on the effects of environmen- tal variation on the survival of larval pelagic fishes, Lima, Peru, 20 April-5 May 1980. IOC Workshop Rep. 28, UNESCO, Paris, p. 67-104.
  5. BEVERTON, R. J. H. 1962. Long-term dynamics of certain North Sea fish populations. In: The exploitation of natural animal populations (399 p.), E. D. LeCren and M. W. Hold- gate (eds.). Blackwell, London.
  6. BURD, A. C., and W. G. PARNELL. 1973. The relationship between larval abundance and stock in the North Sea herring. ICES Rapp. Proc.-Verb., 164: 30-36.
  7. CUSHING, D. H., and J. G. K. HARRIS. 1973. Stock and recruitment and the problem of density-dependence. ICES Rapp. Proc.-Verb., 164: 142-155.
  8. LASKER, R. 1975. Field criteria for survival of anchovy larvae: the relation between inshore chlorophyll maximum layers and successful first feeding. Fish. Bull. U.S., 73: 453-462. 1978. The relation between oceanographic condi- tions and larval anchovy food in the California Current: identification of factors contributing to recruitment fail- ure. ICES Rapp. Proc.-Verb., 173: 212-230.
  9. OWEN, R. W. 1981. Microscale plankton patchiness in the larval anchovy environment. ICES Rapp. Proc.-Verb., 178: 364-368.
  10. SINDERMANN, C. J. 1970. Principle diseases of marine fish and shellfish. Academic Press, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anderson, J. T.
Affiliations
Fisheries and Oceans Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Anderson, J T
Venue
Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science
Published
1988-12-01
Volume
8
Pages
55-66
ISSN
  • 0250-6408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1682-9786
  • 1811-8224
OpenAlex
W59524650
Cited by
714
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 23
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
fish recruitment, size-dependent survival, fish larvae, starvation, year-class strength, food supply, larval growth rate, size-selective predation, temperature effects on growth, marine fish stocks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review